Older Adults Anesthesia Evidence Synthesis
  • Home
  • Balance Tables
  • GRADE
  • Key Question
    • Expanded Preoperative Evaluation
    • Neuraxial versus General Anesthesia
    • TIVA versus Inhalation Anesthesia
    • Potentially Inappropriate Medications
    • Delirium Prophylaxis
  • Appendix
    • Expanded Preoperative Evaluation: study/patient characteristics
    • Neuraxial versus General Anesthesia: study/patient characteristics
    • TIVA versus Inhalation Anesthesia: study/patient characteristics
    • Delirium Prophylaxis: study/patient characteristics
    • Study-level evidence tables
    • Outcome importance ratings & rankings
    • Draft protocol
  • About

Delirium Prophylaxis

  • Key Question
  • Balance Tables
    • Dexmedetomidine
  • Outcomes Reported
  • Included Studies
    • Design, centers, country, and surgery
    • Country Summary
  • Interventions & Comparators
    • Dexmedetomidine
    • Ketamine
    • Melatonin/Ramelteon
  • Delirium Incidence
    • Dexmedetomidine
    • Ketamine
    • Melatonin/Ramelteon
    • Pooled
      • Dexmedetomidine
      •    Subgroups
      • Ketamine
      • Melatonin/Ramelteon
      • Network
  • Neurocognitive Disorder
      <30 days
    • Dexmedetomidine
    • Ketamine
    • Melatonin/Ramelteon
    • Pooled
      • Dexmedetomidine
      • Ketamine
      • Network
  • Neurocognitive Disorder
      30 days to 1 year
    • Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, and Melatonin
    • Pooled
      • Dexmedetomidine
      • Ketamine
      • Network (exploratory)
  • Physical Function
  • Complications
    • Dexmedetomidine
      • Bradycardia
      •    Pooled
      • Hypotension
      •    Pooled
      • Other
      •   Pooled
    • Ketamine
    • Ramelteon
  • Length of Stay
    • Dexmedetomidine
    • Ketamine
    • Melatonin or ramelteon
    • Pooled
      • Dexmedetomidine
      • Melatonin/Ramelteon
  • Mortality
    • Dexmedetomidine
    • Ketamine
    • Melatonin/Ramelteon
    • Pooled
      • Dexmedetomidine
      • Melatonin/Ramelteon
  • Risk of Bias
    • Randomized
    • Nonrandomized
  • References

Delirium Prophylaxis

Key Question

Among older patients undergoing surgery and anesthesia, does dexmedetomidine administered during the perioperative period decrease the risk of postoperative delirium or other adverse cognitive outcomes?

(The original question included ketamine, ramelteon, and melatonin. These unGRADEd results are included here but not in the advisory.)

Balance Tables

Dexmedetomidine

Benefits, harms, and strength of evidence (GRADE) for dexmedetomidine versus placebo or no delirium prophylaxis.

Outcome RCT NRSI Dexmedetomidine Placebo* GRADE† Effect     Estimate
     (95% CI)
I 2   (95% PI)
N (Total) N (Total)
Delirium 31 457 (4,035) 666 (3,739)

⨁⨁⨁◯

RR 0.58 (0.49–0.67)

46%

(0.30–1.10)
Neurocognitive disorder <30 days 9 68 (666) 83 (392)

⨁⨁⨁◯

RR 0.54 (0.39–0.73)

0%

(0.39–0.74)
Neurocognitive disorder 30 days to 1 yr 2 5 (50) 22 (50)

⨁◯◯◯

RR 0.24 (0.11–0.55)

0%

      ‡
Physical function 1 (30) (31)

⨁◯◯◯

SMD 0.39 (-1.57 to 2.34)       ‡
Bradycardia 17 236 (2,031) 129 (1,755)

⨁⨁⨁⨁

RR 1.52 (1.22–1.88)

0%

(0.97–2.37)
18 236 (2,121) 129 (1,842) RD/100 2.0 (-0.4 to 4.4)

57%

(-2.2 to 6.2)
Hypotension 20 611 (2,797) 409 (2,539)

⨁⨁⨁⨁

RR 1.38 (1.10–1.72)

52%

(0.65–2.91)
22 611 (2,916) 409 (2,662) RD/100 4.3 (0.5 to 8.0)

77%

(-10.5 to 19.0)
Other complications 27 3 see below
Length of stay (days) 20 (3,051) (3,075)

⨁⨁◯◯

MD -0.8 (-1.3 to -0.2)§

95%

(-3.3 to 1.7)
Mortality, in-hospital and 30-day 11 17 (2,123) 31 (2,141)

⨁⨁◯◯

RR 0.64 (0.35–1.16)

0%

(0.31–1.32)
12 17 (2,479) 31 (2,495) RD/1000 -0.8 (-4.7 to 3.1)

17%

(-4.7 to 3.2)
RCT: randomized clinical trial; NRSI: nonrandomized studies of interventions; GRADE: Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; PI: prediction interval; RR: risk ratio; SMD: standardized mean difference; RD: risk difference; MD: mean difference.
* In some studies (randomized or not) the control incorporated neither placebo or prophylaxis.
† Very low: ⨁◯◯◯; Low: ⨁⨁◯◯; Moderate: ⨁⨁⨁◯; High: ⨁⨁⨁⨁.
‡ Insufficient data to estimate a valid prediction interval.
§ With Hartung-Knapp adjustment MD -0.8 (-1.5 to -0.08).

Other complications and strength of evidence (GRADE) for dexmedetomidine versus placebo or no delirium prophylaxis.

Outcome RCT NRSI Dexmedetomidine Placebo* GRADE† Effect Estimate (95% CI) I 2   (95% PI)
N (Total) N (Total)
Myocardial infarction 2 1 7 (763) 8 (830)

⨁⨁◯◯

RR 0.98 (0.36–2.67)

0%

      ‡
3 1 7 (1,107) 8 (1,161) RD/1000 0.3 (-4.6 to 5.2)

0%

(-10.5 to 11.0)
Cardiac arrest 1 2 (222) 1 (283)

⨁◯◯◯

RR 0.85 (0.14–5.04)       ‡
1 2 (222) 1 (283) RD/1000 -1.6 (-18.8 to 15.6)       ‡
Stroke 5 1 12 (1,139) 16 (1,231)

⨁⨁◯◯

RR 0.84 (0.40–1.77)

0%

(0.30–2.41)
6 1 12 (1,483) 16 (1,562) RD/1000 -1.4 (-6.0 to 3.2)

0%

(-7.4 to 4.7)
Acute kidney injury 5 1 101 (1,034) 107 (1,092)

⨁⨁◯◯

RR 1.05 (0.69–1.59)

31%

(0.35–2.56)
5 1 101 (1,034) 107 (1,092) RD/1000 3.1 (-12.3 to 18.6)

38%

(-18.8 to 25.0)
Pneumonia 3 14 (315) 13 (329)

⨁◯◯◯

RR 1.09 ( 0.52–2.30)

0%

      ‡
3 14 (315) 13 (329) RD/1000 8.4 (-14.5 to 31.2)

0%

      ‡
Pulmonary congestion 1 1 (147) 0 (157)

⨁◯◯◯

RR 3.20 (0.13–78.02)
1 1 (147) 0 (157) RD/1000 6.8 (-11.6 to 25.2)
Pulmonary embolism 1 1 (147) 1 (157)

⨁◯◯◯

RR 1.07 (0.07–16.92)
1 1 (147) 1 (157) RD/1000 0.4 (-17.8 to 18.6)
Respiratory Depression/Failure 3 5 (230) 9 (242)

⨁◯◯◯

RR 0.65 (0.22–1.94)

0%

      ‡
5 5 (621) 9 (416) RD/1000 0.2 (-10.6 to 11.0)

0%

(-17.3 to 17.7)
RCT: randomized clinical trial; GRADE: Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; RR: risk ratio; RD: risk difference.
* In some studies (randomized or not) the control incorporated neither placebo or prophylaxis.
† Very low: ⨁◯◯◯; Low: ⨁⨁◯◯; Moderate: ⨁⨁⨁◯; High: ⨁⨁⨁⨁.
‡ Insufficient data to estimate a valid prediction interval.

Outcomes Reported

Dexmedetomidine

Table 1. Publications reporting dichotomous or count outcomes in dexmedetomidine studies (not necessarily unique studies).

Outcome RCT, N = 71 NR Trial, N = 6 Prosp Coh, N = 1 Retro Coh, N = 6
ADL — — — —
Complications 37 (52%) 2 (33%) — 2 (33%)
DNCR/POCD 21 (30%) 3 (50%) — —
Delirium 40 (56%) 1 (17%) 1 (100%) 5 (83%)
Delirium duration 2 (2.8%) — — —
Discharge location — — — —
Mortality 15 (21%) — — 2 (33%)
Opioid use 2 (2.8%) — — —
Pain — — — —
QoR — — — —
Readmission 2 (2.8%) — — 1 (17%)
Satisfaction — — — —
ADL: activities of daily living; DNCR: delayed neurocognitive recovery (neurocognitive disorder < 30 days); POCD: postoperative neurocognitive disorder (neurocognitive disorder 30 days to 1 year); QoR: quality of recovery; RCT: randomized clinical trial; NR Trial: non-randomized trial; Prosp Coh: prospective cohort; Retro Coh: retrospective cohort.

Table 2. Publications reporting continuous outcomes in dexmedetomidine studies (not necessarily unique studies).

Outcome RCT, N = 71 NR Trial, N = 6 Prosp Coh, N = 1 Retro Coh, N = 6
Delirium duration 9 (13%) — — 1 (17%)
Length of stay 24 (34%) — — 1 (17%)
Opioid use 7 (9.9%) — — —
RCT: randomized clinical trial; NR Trial: non-randomized trial; Prosp Coh: prospective cohort; Retro Coh: retrospective cohort.

Table 3. Publications reporting likert or ordinal outcomes in dexmedetomidine studies (not necessarily unique studies).

Outcome RCT, N = 71 NR Trial, N = 6 Prosp Coh, N = 1 Retro Coh, N = 6
ADL 1 (1.4%) — — —
DNCR/POCD 35 (49%) 5 (83%) — 1 (17%)
Delirium 1 (1.4%) — — —
Complications — — — —
Pain 16 (23%) — — —
Quality of life — — — —
QoR 2 (2.8%) — — —
Satisfaction — — — —
ADL: activities of daily living; NCR: neurocognitive recovery; POCD: postoperative neurocognitive disorder; QoR: quality of recovery; RCT: randomized clinical trial; NR Trial: non-randomized trial; Prosp Coh: prospective cohort; Retro Coh: retrospective cohort.
Ketamine

Table 4. Publications reporting dichotomous or count outcomes in ketamine studies (not necessarily unique studies).

Outcome RCT, N = 12 Prosp Coh, N = 3 Retro Coh, N = 4
ADL — — —
Complications 2 (17%) — —
DNCR/POCD 7 (58%) — —
Delirium 4 (33%) 3 (100%) 4 (100%)
Delirium duration — — —
Discharge location — — —
Mortality — — —
Opioid use 1 (8.3%) — —
Pain 2 (17%) — —
QoR — — —
Readmission 1 (8.3%) — —
Satisfaction — — —
ADL: activities of daily living; NCR: neurocognitive recovery; POCD: postoperative neurocognitive disorder; QoR: quality of recovery; RCT: randomized clinical trial; Prosp Coh: prospective cohort; Retro Coh: retrospective cohort.

Table 5. Publications reporting continuous outcomes in ketamine studies (not necessarily unique studies).

Outcome RCT, N = 12 Prosp Coh, N = 3 Retro Coh, N = 4
Delirium duration — — —
Length of stay 2 (17%) 1 (33%) —
Opioid use 4 (33%) — —
RCT: randomized clinical trial; Prosp Coh: prospective cohort; Retro Coh: retrospective cohort.

Table 6. Publications reporting likert or ordinal outcomes in ketamine studies (not necessarily unique studies).

Outcome RCT, N = 12 Prosp Coh, N = 3 Retro Coh, N = 4
ADL — — —
DNCR/POCD 6 (50%) — —
Delirium 2 (17%) — —
Complications — — —
Pain 1 (8.3%) — —
Quality of life — — —
QoR — — —
Satisfaction — — —
ADL: activities of daily living; NCR: neurocognitive recovery; POCD: postoperative neurocognitive disorder; QoR: quality of recovery; RCT: randomized clinical trial; Prosp Coh: prospective cohort; Retro Coh: retrospective cohort.
Melatonin or ramelteon

Table 7. Publications reporting dichotomous or count outcomes in melatonin or ramelteon studies (not necessarily unique studies).

Outcome RCT, N = 16 NR Trial, N = 2 Quasi-exp, N = 2 Retro Coh, N = 1
ADL — — — —
Complications 1 (6.3%) — 2 (100%) —
DNCR/POCD 1 (6.3%) — — —
Delirium 15 (94%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 1 (100%)
Delirium duration 1 (6.3%) — — —
Discharge location — — — —
Mortality 3 (19%) — 1 (50%) —
Opioid use — — — —
Pain — — — —
QoR — — — —
Readmission — — — —
Satisfaction — — — —
ADL: activities of daily living; NCR: neurocognitive recovery; POCD: postoperative neurocognitive disorder; QoR: quality of recovery; RCT: randomized clinical trial; NR Trial: non-randomized trial; Quasi-exp: before-after or time series; Retro Coh: retrospective cohort.

Table 8. Publications reporting continuous outcomes in melatonin or ramelteon studies (not necessarily unique studies).

Outcome RCT, N = 16 NR Trial, N = 2 Quasi-exp, N = 2 Retro Coh, N = 1
Delirium duration 4 (25%) — 1 (50%) —
Length of stay 5 (31%) — 2 (100%) —
Opioid use 1 (6.3%) — — —
RCT: randomized clinical trial; NR Trial: non-randomized trial; Quasi-exp: before-after or time series; Retro Coh: retrospective cohort.

Table 9. Publications reporting likert or ordinal outcomes in melatonin or ramelteon studies(not necessarily unique studies).

Outcome RCT, N = 16 NR Trial, N = 2 Quasi-exp, N = 2 Retro Coh, N = 1
ADL 1 (6.3%) — — —
DNCR/POCD 2 (13%) — — —
Delirium 3 (19%) — — —
Complications — — — —
Pain — — — —
Quality of life — — — —
QoR — — — —
Satisfaction — — — —
ADL: activities of daily living; NCR: neurocognitive recovery; POCD: postoperative neurocognitive disorder; QoR: quality of recovery; RCT: randomized clinical trial; NR Trial: non-randomized trial; Quasi-exp: before-after or time series; Retro Coh: retrospective cohort.

Included Studies

See Appendix for detailed summary study and patient characteristics including primary outcomes.

Table 10. Number of studies by design.

Dexmedetomidine
Design Studies
Randomized Clinical Trial 71
Nonrandomized Trial 6
Prospective Cohort 1
Retrospective Cohort 6
Total 84
Studies with multiple publications counted only once (applied to 1 trial with 2 publications).
Ketamine
Design Studies
Randomized Clinical Trial 12
Prospective Cohort 3
Retrospective Cohort 4
Total 19
Melatonin or Ramelteon
Design Studies
Randomized Clinical Trial 16
Nonrandomized Trial 2
Before-After/Time Series 2
Retrospective Cohort 1
Total 21

Design, centers, country, and surgery

Table 11. Study design, enrollment, centers, country, and surgery (see References for citations).

ID Studya Centers Enrolled Countryb Surgery
Dexmedetomidine - Nonrandomized Trial
13361

Wang 2020c

1 110 Chinab GI/Abdominal
5183

Xu 2017

1 96 Chinab GI/Abdominal
5052

Zhang 2019b

1 140 Chinab GI/Abdominal
120

Xie 2018

1 140 Chinab Ortho
13368

Zhang 2020b

1 165 Chinab Spine
13301

Li 2020a

1 87 Chinab Thoracic
Dexmedetomidine - Prospective Cohort
18819

Sun 2023a

1 676 Chinab GI/Abdominal
Dexmedetomidine - Randomized Clinical Trial
13579

Azeem 2018

1 70 Egyptb Cardiac
7240

Chitnis 2022

1 70 Canada Cardiac
2288

Djainai 2016

1 185 Canada Cardiac
1819

Gao 2020

1 60 Chinab Cardiac
5269

Gao 2021 (Gao 2020)

1 40 Chinab Cardiac
13777

Ge 2016

1 50 Chinab Cardiac
17683

Kowalczyk 2022

1 49 Poland Cardiac
24

Li 2017

2 285 Chinab Cardiac
2173

Momeni 2021

1 420 Belgium Cardiac
17019

Qu 2023

1 469 USA Cardiac
18870

Racman 2023

1 78 Slovenia Cardiac
20454

Soh 2020

1 108 South Korea Cardiac
2624

Subramaniam 2019

1 140 USA Cardiac
16008

Turan 2020

6 798 USA Cardiac
16023

Wu 2020

1 80 Chinab Cardiac
13406

Zhou 2019b

1 156 Chinab Cardiac
335

van Norden 2021

1 63 Germany Cardiac|GI/Abdominal
18597

Liu 2023c

1 304 Chinab ENT
5436

Chen 2013

1 126 Chinab GI/Abdominal
889

Chen 2020

1 88 Chinab GI/Abdominal
1288

Du 2019

1 87 Chinab GI/Abdominal
17531

Guo 2022

1 90 Chinab GI/Abdominal
5024

Li 2015

1 100 Chinab GI/Abdominal
4914

Li 2021b

1 120 Chinab GI/Abdominal
18582

Liao 2023

1 104 Chinab GI/Abdominal
13941

Mohamed 2014

1 58 Egyptb GI/Abdominal
12900

Tang 2021

1 100 Chinab GI/Abdominal
18909

Xie 2023

1 240 Chinab GI/Abdominal
1919

Xin 2021

1 60 Chinab GI/Abdominal
8558

Lu 2021

13 808 Chinab GI/Abdominal|Hepatic
5480

Zhang 2021

1 174 Chinab GI/Abdominal|Neuro|Urol
13483

Wang 2019

1 198 Chinab GI/Abdominal|Ortho|Thoracic
261

Lee 2018a

1 354 South Korea GI/Abdominal|Urol
328

Zhang 2018b

1 120 Chinab Headneck
1117

Mansouri 2019

1 150 Iranb Ophtho
18690

Oriby 2023

1 90 Egyptb Ophtho
5452

Guo 2015

1 184 Chinab Oralmax
16845

Liu 2022b

1 120 Chinab Oralmax
1625

Wang 2020a

1 44 Chinab Oralmax
18346

Deng 2023

2 108 Chinab Ortho
17503

Gao 2022

1 95 Chinab Ortho
5240

Hong 2021

2 712 Chinab Ortho
17575

Hu 2022

1 60 Chinab Ortho
2748

Lee 2018b

1 132 South Korea Ortho
742

Li 2019

1 164 Chinab Ortho
18575

Li 2023

1 98 Chinab Ortho
1419

Liu 2016

1 200 Chinab Ortho
3130

Lu 2017

1 152 Chinab Ortho
1735

Mei 2018

1 336 Chinab Ortho
1267

Mei 2020a

1 415 Chinab Ortho
17001

Shin 2023

1 748 South Korea Ortho
13075

Xing 2021

1 110 Chinab Ortho
16303

Yan 2021

1 100 Chinab Ortho
18937

Yoo 2023

1 128 South Korea Ortho
5147

Zhang 2020a

1 240 Chinab Ortho
18958

Zhao 2023

1 88 Chinab Ortho
11129

Zhu 2021

1 187 Chinab Ortho
13568

He 2018

1 90 Chinab Thoracic
3046

Hu 2021

1 177 Chinab Thoracic
69

Huyan 2019

1 360 Chinab Thoracic
18558

Lai 2023

1 90 Chinab Thoracic
16741

Liu 2022a

1 60 Chinab Thoracic
3391

Shi 2020

1 106 Chinab Thoracic
13731

Yu 2017

1 92 Chinab Thoracic
4798

Ding 2015

1 40 Chinab Urol
7151

Wang 2022a

1 125 Chinab Urol
5251

Chawdhary 2020

1 87 Indiab Variousc
2022

Deiner 2017

10 429 USA Variousc
20465

Li 2020b

1 620 Chinab Variousc
16718

Lv 2022

1 327 Chinab Variousc
16734

Wang 2022b

1 100 Chinab Variousc
3716

Zhao 2020

1 432 Chinab Variousc
Dexmedetomidine - Retrospective Cohort
2517

Cheng 2016

1 505 USA Cardiac
103

Chuich 2019

1 278 USA Cardiac
5066

Park 2021

1 714 South Korea Ortho
16830

Xu 2022

1 60 Chinab Ortho
13367

Yin 2020

1 120 Chinab Ortho
17150

Liu 2023b (Liu 2023a)

1 195 Chinab Urol
Ketamine - Prospective Cohort
1140

Juliebo 2009

1 187 Norway Ortho
17147

Ke 2022b (Ke 2022a)

4 98 Singapore Other
9616

Barreto Chang 2022

1 98 USA Spine
Ketamine - Randomized Clinical Trial
181

Hudetz 2009a

1 78 USA Cardiac
1847

Hudetz 2009b (Hudetz 2009a)

1 58 USA Cardiac
5189

Siripoonyothai 2021

1 75 Thailand Cardiac
18435

Han 2023

1 84 Chinab GI/Abdominal
18610

Ma 2023

1 68 China GI/Abdominal
15285

Bornemann-Cimenti 2016

1 60 Austria GI/Abdominal|Hepatic
18690

Oriby 2023

1 90 Egyptb Ophtho
2217

Rascon-Martinez 2016

1 80 Mexicob Ophtho
2578

Lee 2015

1 56 South Korea Ortho
3788

Remerand 2009

1 160 France Ortho
13184

Tu 2021

1 80 Chinab Ortho
2866

Avidan 2017

5 672 USA Variousc
1937

Hollinger 2021

2 143 Switzerland Variousc
Ketamine - Retrospective Cohort
17130

Memtsoudis 2019b (Memtsoudis 2019a)

4,400 564,226 USA Orthod
17136

Memtsoudis 2019g (Memtsoudis 2019a)

4,400 1,130,569 USA Orthoe
18978

Poeran 2020d (Poeran 2020a)

527,254 USA Ortho
17144

Weinstein 2018c (Weinstein 2018a)

1 41,766 USA Orthof
17145

Weinstein 2018d (Weinstein 2018a)

1 41,766 USA Ortho
17149

Fuchita 2019c (Fuchita 2019a)

1 84 USA Thoracic
Melatonin - Nonrandomized Trial
16537

Artemiou 2015

1 500 Slovakia Cardiac
13824

Bily 2015

1 500 Slovakia Cardiac
Melatonin - Randomized Clinical Trial
17055

Dianatkhah 2015

1 145 Iranb Cardiac
17057

El-Naggar 2018

1 50 Egyptb Cardiac
16558

Ford 2020

2 210 Australia Cardiac
9256

Javaherforoosh 2021

1 60 Iranb Cardiac
9741

Shi 2021

1 297 Chinab Cardiac
17152

Esmaeii 2022

1 150 Iranb General|Neuro|Ortho
602

Fan 2017

1 148 Chinab Ortho
17153

Fazel 2022

1 80 Iranb Ortho
17154

Mohamed 2022

1 80 Egyptb Ortho
5164

Sultan 2010

1 152 Egyptb Ortho
16552

de Jonghe 2014

3 452 Netherlands Ortho
Ramelteon - Before-After/Time Series
693

Hokuto 2020

1 309 Japan Hepatic
2997

Miyata 2017

1 82 Japan Thoracic
Ramelteon - Randomized Clinical Trial
17084

Tanifuji 2022

1 112 Japan GI/Abdominal|Hepatic
18530

Kinouchi 2023

1 108 Japan General|Thoracic|Urol|Vasc
3841

Oh 2021

1 80 USA Ortho
4150

Jaiswal 2019

1 120 USA Thoracic
13512

Gupta 2019

1 100 Indiab Variousc
Ramelteon - Retrospective Cohort
20438

Ishibashi-Kanno 2020a

1 69 Japan Headneck
GI: gastrointestinal; Ortho: orthopedic; Neuro: neurological; Oralmax: oral maxillofacial; Vasc: vascular; ENT: ear nose and throat.
a Studies examining drugs not directly relevant to recommendations but potentially to the evidence space (eg, a connected network including indirect evidence) are included here.
b Non very-high Human Development Index country.
c Described as various or more than 4 different types of surgery.
d Hip arthroplasty.
e Knee arthroplasty.
f Intraoperative ketamine.

Country Summary

Table 12. Summary of randomized clinical trials according to country.

N = 98a
Country
    China 56 (57%)
    USA 8 (8.2%)
    Egypt 6 (6.1%)
    South Korea 6 (6.1%)
    Iran 5 (5.1%)
    Canada 2 (2.0%)
    India 2 (2.0%)
    Japan 2 (2.0%)
    Australia 1 (1.0%)
    Austria 1 (1.0%)
    Belgium 1 (1.0%)
    France 1 (1.0%)
    Germany 1 (1.0%)
    Mexico 1 (1.0%)
    Netherlands 1 (1.0%)
    Poland 1 (1.0%)
    Slovenia 1 (1.0%)
    Switzerland 1 (1.0%)
    Thailand 1 (1.0%)
a n (%)

Interventions & Comparators

Dexmedetomidine

Table 13. Selected characteristics, comparators, and dosing in dexmedetomidine trials.

Study N Arm ASA Anesthetic     Ageb MMSEc,b Dexmedetomidine mcg/kg Timinge
  PSa Vol TIVA Reg Sed Load Maint/hrd Postop
Cardiac - Randomized Clinical Trial

Djainai 2016

92 Prop NR ✓

72.4 (6.2)

91 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

72.7 (6.4)

0.4 (0.2–0.7)

▁▁▁▆

Ge 2016

24 Plac 123  ✓

72.0 (4.0)

26.9 (0.8)

24 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

70.0 (3.0)

27.2 (0.9)

0.3 0.3

▁▆▆▁

Li 2017

143 Plac  234 ✓ ✓

67.5 (5.3)

29 [28-30]

142 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

66.4 (5.4)

29 [28-30]

0.6 0.4 0.1

▁▁▆▆

Azeem 2018

30 Mid NR ✓

66.7 (5.6)

30 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

65.3 (4.8)

(0.4–0.7)

▁▁▁▆

Subramaniam 2019

61 Prop NR

70.0 {64-79}

59 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

66.5 {63-74}

0.5 (0.1–0.4)

▁▁▁▆

Zhou 2019b

38 Plac 123  ✓ ✓

70.0 (4.9)

39 Ulin ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

70.6 (4.4)

39 Dex/Ulin ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.6 (5.0)

0.4

▁▁▆▁

38 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.8 (5.1)

0.4

▁▁▆▁

Gao 2020

30 Plac  23  ✓

70.4 (4.2)

30 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.5 (5.1)

1.0 (0.3–0.5)

▁▆▆▁

Soh 2020

54 Plac NR ✓ ✓

65.0 [37-83]

54 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

65.0 [23-82]

▁▁▆▁

Turan 2020

396 Plac 1234 ✓ ✓

62.0 (12.0)

398 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

63.0 (11.0)

0.1 0.4

▁▆▆▆

Wu 2020

40 Plac  23  ✓

67.7 (8.8)

28.2

40 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

68.2 (8.6)

28.1

0.5 0.6

▁▆▆▁

Gao 2021

20 Plac  23  ✓

71.4 (4.5)

28.4 (1.3)

20 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

71.4 (4.5)

28.5 (1.4)

0.6 0.2

▁▆▆▁

Momeni 2021

203 Plac NR ✓

70.0 {59-81}

28 {26-29}

205 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

71.0 {61-81}

28 {26-29}

0.4

▁▁▁▆

Chitnis 2022

33 Prop NR ✓

78.8

30.2

34 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

78.7

30.1

0.5 (0–1.5)

▁▁▁▆

Kowalczyk 2022

23 None  23  ✓

66.0 (5.0)

23 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

67.0 (10.0)

0.5 0.25

▁▆▆▁

Qu 2023

206 Plac NR

70.0 {65-75}

188 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

67.5 {63-73}

1

▁▁▁▆

Racman 2023

34 Prop NR ✓

83.5 {79-87}

26 {25-28}

37 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

83.0 {77-85}

27 {25-28}

0.5 (0.2–1)

▁▆▆▁

Ortho - Randomized Clinical Trial

Liu 2016 (MCI)

40 Plac  23  ✓

75.2 (7.8)

22.4 (2.6)

39 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

72.8 (8.2)

23.3 (2.7)

(0.2–0.4)

▁▁▆▁

Liu 2016 (no MCI)

58 Plac  23  ✓

72.8 (9.2)

25.4 (2.4)

60 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

71.2 (8.1)

26.2 (3.5)

(0.2–0.4)

▁▁▆▁

Lu 2017

76 Dex  23  ✓ ✓

65.0 (5.8)

28.3 (1.3)

0.5 0.5

▁▆▆▁

75 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

65.5 (5.3)

28.5 (1.2)

0.5 0.5 0.06

▁▆▆▆

Lee 2018b

31 Plac 12   ✓

67.2 (5.0)

33 Preg ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

68.4 (5.1)

29 Dex/Preg ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

65.4 (9.7)

0.5 0.5
31 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

68.8 (5.9)

0.5 0.5

▁▆▆▁

Mei 2018

148 Prop  23  ✓

74.0 (6.0)

25.7 (1.7)

148 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

76.0 (7.0)

26.2 (2.1)

0.9 (0.1–0.5)

▁▆▁▁

Li 2019

55 Prop 123  ✓

68.2 (6.4)

54 Mid ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

66.9 (6.6)

55 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.3 (7.1)

▁▁▆▁

Mei 2020a

183 Prop NR ✓

73.0 (11.0)

27.1 (1.4)

183 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

72.0 (9.0)

26.6 (2.9)

0.9 (0.1–0.5)

▁▁▆▁

Zhang 2020a

120 Plac 123  ✓

79.0 (6.8)

120 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

78.1 (6.4)

0.5 0.3

▆▁▆▁

Hong 2021

354 Plac 1234 ✓ ✓

71.0 (5.0)

26.1 (3.0)

356 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

71.0 (5.0)

26.1 (2.9)

0.03

▁▁▁▆

Xing 2021

55 Plac  23  ✓

69.2 (3.8)

55 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

68.3 (3.9)

0.5

▁▆▁▁

Yan 2021

50 Plac 12   ✓

72.7 (4.3)

29.2 (0.3)

50 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

73.2 (5.8)

29.5 (0.2)

0.3

▁▆▁▁

Zhu 2021

92 Plac 123  ✓

75.2 (6.1)

28.6 (0.9)

95 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

74.1 (4.4)

28.9 (0.8)

1.0 0.5

▆▁▆▁

Gao 2022

48 Plac 123  ✓

67.2 (5.2)

47 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

68.2 (6.0)

1.0 0.4 2

▁▆▆▆

Hu 2022

20 None NR ✓

68.9 (4.3)

20 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.2 (5.0)

0.4

▁▆▆▁

Deng 2023

52 Dex  23  ✓

70.8 (4.4)

53 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

71.8 (5.5)

(0.2–0.7)

▁▁▆▁

Li 2023

49 None NR ✓

68.5 (2.2)

49 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

67.7 (2.8)

4 0.2

▁▆▆▁

Shin 2023

366 Prop 12   ✓

71.0 {67-75}

366 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

72.0 {68-76}

1.0 (0.1–0.5)

▁▁▆▁

Yoo 2023

64 Plac 123  ✓

74.2 (6.2)

64 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

74.4 (6.0)

1.0 0.2

▁▁▆▁

Zhao 2023

42 Plac NR ✓

69.7 (7.2)

25.8 (0.6)

40 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

70.9 (7.2)

25.9 (0.4)

200

▁▁▁▆

GI/Abd - Randomized Clinical Trial

Chen 2013

63 Plac NR ✓

67.9 (6.6)

28.5 (1.1)

59 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

66.2 (7.5)

28.2 (0.8)

1.0 0.4

▁▆▆▁

Mohamed 2014

25 Plac 123  ✓ ✓

67.8 (5.4)

25 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

63.9 (5.0)

0.17 0.4

▆▆▆▁

Li 2015

50 Plac 123  ✓

70.0 (6.0)

28.3 (1.4)

50 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.0 (5.0)

28.4 (1.3)

1.0 0.4

▁▆▆▁

Du 2019

20 Plac 12   ✓

68.7 (13.5)

26.8 (1.5)

20 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.3 (12.5)

26.5 (1.7)

0.6

▁▁▆▁

Chen 2020

45 Plac 12   ✓

65.4 (11.7)

29.3 (0.4)

43 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

64.9 (11.4)

29.4 (0.5)

0.3 1

▁▁▆▁

Li 2021b

30 Plac 123  ✓

73.4 (5.1)

28.7 (2.1)

30 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

74.7 (2.6)

27.6 (3.2)

0.3 0.2

▆▁▆▁

30 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

71.2 (3.5)

28.0 (1.7)

0.3 0.5

▆▁▆▁

30 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.8 (4.3)

28.4 (2.6)

0.3 0.8

▆▁▆▁

Lu 2021

331 Plac 123  ✓

70.4 (6.5)

344 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

70.1 (5.8)

0.5 0.2

▁▆▆▁

Tang 2021

50 Plac 12   ✓ ✓

70.7 (6.5)

50 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.7 (6.6)

0.5 0.4

▁▆▆▁

Xin 2021

30 Plac  23  ✓

68.0 [66-71]

30 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.0 [67-70]

0.5 0.4

▆▁▆▁

Guo 2022

45 None  23  ✓

68.5 (3.8)

45 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

68.5 (3.8)

1.0 0.5

▁▆▆▁

Liao 2023

35 Plac NR ✓

69.7 (2.5)

27.7 (1.9)

34 Rem ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

70.1 (3.6)

27.7 (1.7)

35 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

71.3 (3.6)

27.8 (2.1)

0.5 (0.3–0.5)

▁▆▆▁

Xie 2023

119 Plac NR ✓

68.6 (5.5)

117 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

67.9 (5.6)

3

▁▁▁▆

Various - Randomized Clinical Trial

Deiner 2017

201 Plac 1234 ✓ ✓

74.0 {71-78}

189 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

74.0 {71-78}

0.5

▁▁▆▆

Lee 2018a

109 Plac 123  ✓

73.1 (6.1)

95 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

72.2 (5.4)

1.0 (0.2–0.7)

▁▆▆▁

114 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

73.1 (6.4)

1.0

▁▁▆▁

Wang 2019

100 Mid 123  ✓

69.4 (4.5)

25.0 (3.3)

98 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

70.5 (5.0)

24.9 (3.9)

0.5

▆▁▁▁

Chawdhary 2020

40 Prop 123  ✓

64.7 (5.9)

26.4 (1.3)

40 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

66.2 (6.6)

26.1 (1.2)

(0.5–0.7)

▁▁▆▁

Li 2020b

310 Plac 123  ✓ ✓

69.0 (6.4)

27.4 (2.7)

309 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.0 (6.6)

27.4 (2.6)

0.6 0.5

▁▁▆▁

Zhao 2020

101 None  23  ✓

69.2 (4.1)

27 {24-30}

108 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

70.0 (4.5)

27 {24-30}

1.0 100f

▁▆▆▁

105 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.4 (3.9)

27 {24-30}

1.0 200f

▁▆▆▁

102 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.3 (4.1)

27 {24-30}

1.0 400f

▁▆▆▁

Zhang 2021

87 Plac  23  ✓

71.4 (4.9)

25.8 (0.8)

87 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

70.6 (4.2)

26.1 (0.7)

1.0 0.4

▁▆▆▁

van Norden 2021

32 Plac 1234 ✓ ✓

70.5 (6.2)

28 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

70.4 (7.1)

0.7

▁▁▆▁

Lv 2022

157 Plac NR ✓

68.4 (6.6)

152 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

67.9 (5.9)

▁▁▁▆

Wang 2022b

40 None 123  ✓

71.0 (7.1)

27 {23-30}

42 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.4 (6.8)

27 {23-30}

0.6

▁▆▆▁

Thoracic - Randomized Clinical Trial

Yu 2017

46 Mid 12   ✓

69.1 (4.9)

29.8 (0.7)

46 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

68.7 (4.3)

29.8 (0.7)

0.2 0.5 (0.2–0.7)

▁▆▆▁

He 2018

30 Plac 123  ✓ ✓

83.2 (5.1)

30 Mid ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

81.9 (6.2)

30 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

82.5 (5.4)

0.5 0.4

▆▆▆▁

Huyan 2019

173 Plac  23  ✓

71.0 (6.0)

173 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

70.0 (5.0)

0.5 0.1

▆▁▆▁

Shi 2020

53 Plac  23  ✓ ✓

68.7 (3.4)

28.0 (0.9)

53 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

68.7 (4.6)

27.9 (0.9)

0.5

▁▆▆▁

Hu 2021

87 Plac 123  ✓

69.1 (5.1)

90 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.6 (4.5)

0.4 0.1

▁▆▆▁

Liu 2022a

31 Plac 12   ✓

68.5 (2.3)

29 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

68.1 (2.6)

1.0

▁▆▁▁

Lai 2023

30 None  23  ✓

71.2 (5.1)

29 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

70.6 (5.3)

1.0 0.5

▁▆▆▁

Oralmax - Randomized Clinical Trial

Guo 2015

73 Plac 123  ✓

71.3 (5.1)

28.0 (1.6)

76 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

70.7 (5.2)

28.2 (1.6)

0.2

▁▁▁▆

Wang 2020a

20 Mid NR ✓

60.5 (8.2)

20 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

60.0 (10.1)

1.0 (0.2–0.7)

▁▁▁▆

Liu 2022b

60 Plac 12   ✓

72.1 (5.9)

60 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

71.3 (6.7)

0.5 0.4

▁▆▆▁

Urol - Randomized Clinical Trial

Ding 2015

20 Plac NR ✓
20 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
2

▁▆▁▁

Wang 2022a

60 Plac 12   ✓

66.7 (4.1)

25.4 (2.2)

60 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

65.6 (3.4)

25.5 (2.5)

0.4

▁▆▁▁

Headneck - Randomized Clinical Trial

Zhang 2018b

30 Mid/Prop NR ✓

69.9 (2.8)

28.5 (1.2)

30 Mid/Sevo ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

70.1 (3.2)

28.6 (1.2)

30 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

68.8 (3.0)

29.0 (0.9)

1.0 0.5

▁▆▆▁

30 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.3 (3.1)

28.8 (1.1)

1.0 0.5

▁▆▆▁

ENT - Randomized Clinical Trial

Liu 2023c

149 Plac NR ✓ ✓

70.1 (4.2)

23.9 (4.9)

150 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

70.4 (5.0)

24.3 (4.8)

0.5 0.2

▁▁▆▁

Ortho - Nonrandomized Trial

Xie 2018

70 Plac NR ✓

69.7 (5.3)

27.3 (0.7)

70 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

68.2 (5.6)

27.6 (0.5)

0.5 0.4

▁▆▆▁

Spine - Nonrandomized Trial

Zhang 2020b

46 Plac 123  ✓

70.6 (6.1)

25.6 (4.8)

57 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

71.4 (6.7)

24.1 (4.6)

0.5

▁▆▆▁

62 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

72.5 (7.2)

25.8 (4.5)

1

▁▆▆▁

Ophtho - Randomized Clinical Trial

Mansouri 2019

50 Plac 12   ✓

64.0 (7.2)

50 Mid ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

63.6 (8.3)

50 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

66.5 (1.6)

1

▁▁▆▁

Oriby 2023

30 Plac  23  ✓

70.6 (5.6)

30 Ket ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

72.8 (5.3)

▁▆▆▁

30 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

73.3 (5.1)

0.5

▁▆▆▁

GI/Abd - Nonrandomized Trial

Xu 2017

48 Plac 12   ✓

72.1 (32.2)

48 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

71.9 (31.4)

0.5

▁▁▆▁

Zhang 2019b

60 Plac NR ✓

74.1 (13.9)

28.9 (1.2)

80 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

73.8 (14.5)

28.9 (1.2)

1.0 (0.2–0.7)

▁▁▆▁

Wang 2020c

50 Plac NR ✓ ✓

68.3 (2.1)

28.5 (4.2)

60 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

68.4 (3.3)

28.5 (4.3)

0.5 0.4

▆▁▁▁

Thoracic - Nonrandomized Trial

Li 2020a

46 None NR ✓

67.3 (2.1)

28.5 (4.2)

41 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

67.4 (3.3)

28.5 (4.3)

0.5 0.1

▁▁▆▁

GI/Abd - Prospective Cohort

Sun 2023a

289 None 123 

69.3 (5.1)

354 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

69.3 (5.1)

Unspecified

Cardiac - Retrospective Cohort

Cheng 2016

283 None NR ✓

73.5 (6.2)

222 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

73.6 (6.1)

(0.24–0.6)

▁▁▆▆

Chuich 2019

209 Prop NR ✓

62.0 (13.0)

69 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

63.0 (13.0)

0.19 (0.08–0.31)

▁▁▆▁

Ortho - Retrospective Cohort

Yin 2020

58 Plac 12   ✓

72.1 (0.2)

28.7 (1.1)

62 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

72.2 (0.3)

28.6 (1.3)

0.5 0.4

▆▁▆▁

Park 2021

357 Prop 123  ✓

74.0 {70-78}

357 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

74.0 {70-79}

1.0 (0.1–0.5)

▁▆▆▁

Xu 2022

30 None NR ✓

67.9 (5.0)

18.0 (1.5)

30 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

67.3 (5.5)

18.3 (2.0)

0.5 0.4

▁▆▆▁

Urol - Retrospective Cohort

Liu 2023b

35 None 1234

68.0 [66-72]

160 Dex ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

68.0 [66-72]

▁▁▆▁

GI: gastrointestinal; Abd: abdominal (includes hepatic); Ortho: orthopedic; Various: more that one procedure category; Oralmax: oral and maxillofacial; Ophtho; ophthalmologic; Urol: urologic; Dex: dexmedetomidine; Ulin: ulinastatin; Mid: midazolam; Mid/Prop: midazolam/propofol; Mid/Seve: midazolam/sevoflurane; Preg: pregabalin; Prop: propofol; Plac; placebo; PS: physical status; Vol: volatile; TIVA: total intravenous anesthesia; Reg: regional; Sed: sedation; MMSE: Mini-Mental State Exam.
a ASA Physical Status of patients included (proportions can be found here[link to table add]).
b Mean Med (SD)[Range]{IQR}.
c No studies reported including cognitively impaired patients except Liu 2016 as indicated.
d Maintenance range if reported in parentheses.
e Bars indicate adminstration times from left to right: preoperative, induction, intraoperative, and postoperative (includes PACU).
f Given as a single dose.

Ketamine

Table 14. Selected characteristics, comparators, and dosing in ketamine studies.

Study N Arm ASA Anesthetic Ageb MMSEb,c Dose Maintenance Timingd
  PSa Vol TIVA Reg (mg/kg)   (mg/kg)
Cardiac - Randomized Clinical Trial

Hudetz 2009a

26 None NR ✓

64.0 (7.0)

26 Plac

67.0 (8.0)

26 Ket

68.0 (7.0)

0.5

▁▆▁▁

Hudetz 2009b

29 Plac   34 ✓

60.8 (8.0)

29 Ket

68.0 (8.0)

0.5

▁▆▁▁

Siripoonyothai 2021

32 Prop NR ✓
32 Ket
1

▁▆▆▁

Ortho - Randomized Clinical Trial

Remerand 2009

75 Plac NR ✓

65.0 (14.0)

79 Ket

64.0 (13.0)

0.5

▁▁▆▆

Lee 2015

26 Plac 123  ✓

68.4 (6.5)

26 {24-28}

25 Ket

68.3 (5.3)

25 {24-28}

0.5

▁▆▁▁

Tu 2021

40 Suf 123  ✓

65.3 (5.2)

40 Kete

66.0 (5.3)

0.5

▁▆▁▁

GI/Abd - Randomized Clinical Trial

Bornemann-Cimenti 2016

19 Plac 123  ✓ ✓

61.0 (12.4)

19 Kete

58.4 (8.1)

0.01

▁▁▆▆

18 Kete

62.2 (9.8)

0.25 0.12

▁▁▆▆

Han 2023

34 Plac NR ✓

70.0 (6.2)

27.9 (1.6)

33 Ket

70.6 (7.6)

28.6 (1.1)

0.15

▁▆▁▁

Ma 2023

31 Plac  23  ✓

70.5 (4.2)

31 Ket

69.5 (4.3)

0.25 0.12

▁▆▆▁

Various - Randomized Clinical Trial

Avidan 2017

222 Plac NR

70.0 (6.9)

227 Ket

70.0 (7.2)

0.5

▁▁▆▁

223 Ket

70.0 (7.3)

1

Hollinger 2021

44 Plac NR

74.8 (6.6)

28.3 (2.3)

45 Hal

73.4 (6.3)

28.0 (1.3)

47 Ket

73.4 (6.1)

27.7 (1.7)

1

▆▁▁▁

Ophtho - Randomized Clinical Trial

Rascon-Martinez 2016

32 Plac 123  ✓

70.5 (4.7)

33 Ket

68.7 (7.1)

0.3

Oriby 2023

30 Plac  23  ✓

70.6 (5.6)

30 Dex

73.3 (5.1)

0.3

▁▆▆▁

30 Ket

72.8 (5.3)

0.3

▁▆▆▁

Ortho - Prospective Cohort

Juliebo 2009

119 None NR ✓
68 Ket

▁▁▆▁

Spine - Prospective Cohort

Barreto Chang 2022

38 None 123 

71.0 {68-78}

60 Ket

70.0 {67-75}

Unspecified

Other - Prospective Cohort

Ke 2022b

92 None NR
6 Ket

▁▁▆▁

Ortho - Retrospective Cohort

Weinstein 2018c

31,796 None NR ✓
4,070 Ket

Weinstein 2018d

36,852 None NR ✓
99 Ket

▁▁▁▆

Memtsoudis 2019b

538,559 None NR
25,667 Ket

▁▁▆▆

Memtsoudis 2019g

1,081,139 None NR
49,430 Ket

▁▁▆▆

Poeran 2020d

468,004 None NR ✓ ✓ ✓
37,148 Ket

▆▁▁▆

Thoracic - Retrospective Cohort

Fuchita 2019c

74 None NR

61.7 (10.5)

10 Ket

61.7 (10.5)

▁▁▆▁

GI: gastrointestinal; Abd: abdominal (includes hepatic); Ortho: orthopedic; Various: more that one procedure category; Dex: dexmedetomidine; Hal: haloperidol; Suf: sufentanil; Prop: propofol; Plac; placebo; PS: physical status; Vol: volatile; TIVA: total intravenous anesthesia; Reg: regional; MMSE: Mini-Mental State Exam.
a ASA Physical Status of patients included (proportions can be found here[link to table add]).
b Mean Med (SD)[Range]{IQR}.
c No studies reported including cognitively impaired patients.
d Bars indicate adminstration times from left to right: preoperative, induction, intraoperative, and postoperative (includes PACU).
e S-Ketamine.

Melatonin/Ramelteon

Table 15. Selected characteristics, comparators, and dosing in melatonin and ramelteon studies.

Study N Arm ASA Anesthetic Ageb MMSEb,c Dosing Timingd
  PSa Vol TIVA Reg
Cardiac - Randomized Clinical Trial

Dianatkhah 2015

71 Oxaz NR

61.7 (9.9)

66 Mel

60.0 (10.2)

3mg × 10

▆▆

El-Naggar 2018

25 Plac   34 ✓

67.9 (4.1)

29 [28-30]

25 Mel

66.6 (4.8)

29 [27-30]

3mg × 5

▆▆

Ford 2020

104 Plac NR

67.6 (8.0)

98 Mel

69.0 (8.3)

3mg × 7

▆▆

Javaherforoosh 2021

30 Plac NR ✓

62.9 (8.1)

30 Mel

60.3 (9.5)

3mg × 3

▆▆

Shi 2021

149 Plac NR

71.6 (6.6)

148 Mel

71.5 (6.7)

3mg × 7

▁▆

Ortho - Randomized Clinical Trial

Sultan 2010

49 None 123  ✓

72.3 (6.4)

50 Mid

69.9 (8.2)

53 Mel

70.4 (7.1)

5mg × 2

▆▁

de Jonghe 2014

192 Plac NR

83.4 (7.5)

23 {10-28}

186 Mel

84.1 (8.0)

23 {12-29}

3mg × 5

▆▆

Fan 2017

70 Plac 123  ✓

74.6 (5.4)

27.1 (0.3)

69 Mel

74.5 (5.7)

27.3 (0.2)

1mg × 6

▆▆

Oh 2021

39 Plac NR

75.4 (5.0)

28.2 (1.9)

41 Ram

74.3 (5.5)

28.6 (1.5)

8mg × 3

▆▆

Fazel 2022

36 Plac NR ✓
36 Mel
5mg × 4

▆▆

Mohamed 2022

40 Plac 123 
40 Mel
5mg × 2

▆▁

GI/Abd - Randomized Clinical Trial

Tanifuji 2022

19 Plac NR

73.7 (5.8)

23 Ram

72.7 (5.2)

4mg × 14

▆▁

Thoracic - Randomized Clinical Trial

Jaiswal 2019

58 Plac NR

56.1 (15.8)

59 Ram

58.1 (14.1)

8mg × 6

▆▆

Various - Randomized Clinical Trial

Gupta 2019

50 Plac 12   ✓

70.6 (3.8)

50 Ram

69.3 (4.0)

8mg × 2

▆▁

Esmaeii 2022

49 None NR ✓ ✓

73.7 (6.0)

26.2 (2.2)

51 Mel

75.9 (6.1)

26.4 (2.1)

5mg × 2

▆▁

Kinouchi 2023

49 Plac 123  ✓ ✓

75.4 (5.6)

54 Ram

78.1 (6.9)

8mg × 6

▆▆

Cardiac - Nonrandomized Trial

Artemiou 2015

250 None NR ✓

65.2 (10.3)

250 Mel

64.3 (10.1)

5mg × 4

▆▆

Bily 2015

250 None NR ✓

65.2 (10.3)

250 Mel

64.3 (10.1)

5mg × 4

▆▆

GI/Abd - Before-After/Time Series

Hokuto 2020

186 None 123 

69.0 [30-88]

120 Ram

71.0 [34-85]

8mg × 4

▆▆

Thoracic - Before-After/Time Series

Miyata 2017

58 None NR ✓ ✓

76.5 [70-87]

24 Ram

79.0 [70-89]

8mg × 7

▁▆

Headneck - Retrospective Cohort

Ishibashi-Kanno 2020a

34 None NR

62.9 (11.9)

35 Ram

62.9 (11.9)

NR

▁▆

GI: gastrointestinal; Abd: abdominal (includes hepatic); Ortho: orthopedic; Various: more that one procedure category; PS: physical status; Vol: volatile; TIVA: total intravenous anesthesia; Reg: regional; MMSE: Mini-Mental State Exam; Mel: melatonin; Ram: ramelteon; Oxaz: oxazepam; Dex: dexmedetomidine; Mid: midazolam; Plac; placebo; NR: not reported.
a ASA Physical Status of patients included (proportions can be found here[link to table add]).
b Mean Med (SD)[Range]{IQR}.
c No studies reported including cognitively impaired patients.
d Bars indicate adminstration times: preoperative left and postoperative right.

Delirium Incidence

Figure 1. Box plots displaying delirium incidence by surgical category across all treatment arms in randomized clinical trials.

Dex: dexmedetomidine; Ket: ketamine; Mel: melatonin; Ram: ramelteon; Oxaz: oxazepam; MS: morphine sulfate; Prop: propofol; Plac: placebo or no delirium prophylaxis.
The “Any” and “Plac” box plots are not mutually exclusive.
Outliers not designated.

Dexmedetomidine

Table 16. Delirium incidence and ascertainment during hospitalization in randomized clinical trials of dexmedetomidine.

Study  N Arm Scale Day(s)a Incidence Proportion RR (95% CI) Timingb
N (%) 0 – 100%
Cardiac

Djainai 2016

92 Prop CAM 5 29 (31.5)
—
91 Dexc 16 (17.6)
0.56 (0.33-0.95) ▁▁▁▆

Li 2017

143 Plac CAM 5 11 (7.7)
—
142 Dex 7 (4.9)
0.64 (0.26-1.61) ▁▁▆▆

Azeem 2018

30 Mid CAM 7 2 (6.7)
—
30 Dexc 1 (3.3)
0.50 (0.05-5.22) ▁▁▁▆

Subramaniam 2019

61 Prop CAM Stay 13 (21.3)
—
59 Dexc 10 (16.9)
0.80 (0.38-1.67) ▁▁▁▆

Soh 2020

54 Plac DSM 7 7 (13.0)
—
54 Dex 2 (3.7)
0.29 (0.06-1.31) ▁▁▆▁

Turan 2020

396 Plac CAM 5 46 (11.6)
—
398 Dex 67 (16.8)
1.45 (1.02-2.05) ▁▆▆▆

Gao 2021

20 Plac DSM Noted 10 (50.0)e
—
20 Dex 3 (15.0)e
0.30 (0.10-0.93) ▁▆▆▁

Momeni 2021

203 Plac CAM Stay 33 (16.3)
—
205 Dexc 31 (15.1)
0.93 (0.59-1.46) ▁▁▁▆

Chitnis 2022

33 Prop ICDSC 5 14 (42.4)
—
34 Dexc 8 (23.5)
0.55 (0.27-1.14) ▁▁▁▆

Kowalczyk 2022

23 None NS Stay 5 (21.7)
—
23 Dex 2 (8.7)
0.40 (0.09-1.86) ▁▆▆▁

Qu 2023

206 Plac CAM 3 25 (12.1)
—
188 Dexc 14 (7.4)
0.61 (0.33-1.14)f ▁▁▁▆

Racman 2023

34 Prop CAM 2 4 (11.8)
—
37 Dex 1 (2.7)
0.23 (0.03-1.96) ▁▆▆▁
Ortho

Liu 2016 (MCI)

40 Plac CAM 7 25 (62.5)
—
39 Dex 10 (25.6)
0.41 (0.23-0.74) ▁▁▆▁

Liu 2016 (no MCI)

58 Plac CAM 7 18 (31.0)
—
60 Dex 5 (8.3)
0.27 (0.11-0.68) ▁▁▆▁

Lee 2018b

31 Plac Psych Stay 11 (35.5)
—
33 Preg 14 (42.4)
1.20 (0.64-2.22)
29 Dex/Preg 7 (24.1)
0.68 (0.31-1.52)
31 Dex 3 (9.7)
0.27 (0.08-0.88) ▁▆▆▁

Mei 2018

148 Prop CAM 3 24 (16.2)
—
148 Dex 11 (7.4)
0.46 (0.23-0.90) ▁▆▁▁

Mei 2020a

183 Prop CAM 7 43 (23.5)
—
183 Dex 26 (14.2)
0.60 (0.39-0.94) ▁▁▆▁

Zhang 2020a

120 Plac CAM/DSM 3 36 (30.0)
—
120 Dex 20 (16.7)
0.56 (0.34-0.90) ▆▁▆▁

Hong 2021

354 Plac CAM 5 26 (7.3)
—
356 Dexc 17 (4.8)
0.65 (0.36-1.18) ▁▁▁▆

Xing 2021

55 Plac Noteg 1 8 (14.5)
—
55 Dex 2 (3.6)
0.25 (0.06-1.12) ▁▆▁▁

Yan 2021

50 Plac CAM 7 13 (26.0)
—
50 Dex 5 (10.0)
0.38 (0.15-1.00) ▁▆▁▁

Hu 2022

20 None DOC 5 3 (15.0)
—
20 Dex 1 (5.0)
0.33 (0.04-2.94) ▁▆▆▁

Shin 2023

366 Prop CAM 3 24 (6.6)
—
366 Dex 11 (3.0)
0.46 (0.23-0.92) ▁▁▆▁

Yoo 2023

64 Plac CAM Stay 10 (15.6)
—
64 Dex 4 (6.2)
0.40 (0.13-1.21) ▁▁▆▁
Various

Deiner 2017

201 Plac CAM 5 23 (11.4)
—
189 Dex 23 (12.2)
1.06 (0.62-1.83) ▁▁▆▆

Lee 2018a

109 Plac CAM 5 27 (24.8)
—
95 Dex 9 (9.5)
0.38 (0.19-0.77) ▁▆▆▁
114 Dex 21 (18.4)
0.74 (0.45-1.23) ▁▁▆▁

Li 2020b

310 Plac CAM 5 32 (10.3)
—
309 Dex 17 (5.5)
0.53 (0.30-0.94) ▁▁▆▁

Zhao 2020

101 None CAM 7 19 (18.8)
—
108 Dex 15 (13.9)
0.74 (0.40-1.37) ▁▆▆▁
105 Dex 5 (4.8)
0.25 (0.10-0.65) ▁▆▆▁
102 Dex 5 (4.9)
0.26 (0.10-0.67) ▁▆▆▁

van Norden 2021

32 Plac CAM/ICDSC 14 14 (43.8)
—
28 Dex 5 (17.9)
0.41 (0.17-0.99) ▁▁▆▁

Lv 2022

157 Plac CAM 7 46 (29.3)
—
152 Dexc 21 (13.8)
0.47 (0.30-0.75) ▁▁▁▆
Thoracic

Yu 2017

46 Mid CAM 3 10 (21.7)
—
46 Dex 3 (6.5)
0.30 (0.09-1.02) ▁▆▆▁

He 2018

30 Plac CAM Noted 15 (50.0)e
—
30 Mid 17 (56.7)e
1.13 (0.70-1.82)
30 Dex 7 (23.3)e
0.47 (0.22-0.98) ▆▆▆▁

Huyan 2019

173 Plac ICDSC Noted 47 (27.2)e
—
173 Dex 27 (15.6)e
0.57 (0.38-0.88) ▆▁▆▁

Shi 2020

53 Plac CAM 7 6 (11.3)
—
53 Dex 4 (7.5)
0.67 (0.20-2.23) ▁▆▆▁

Hu 2021

87 Plac CAM 4 32 (36.8)
—
90 Dex 15 (16.7)
0.45 (0.26-0.78) ▁▆▆▁

Lai 2023

30 None CAM Noted 9 (30.0)e
—
29 Dex 5 (17.2)e
0.57 (0.22-1.51) ▁▆▆▁
Oralmax

Wang 2020a

20 Mid NS Stay 9 (45.0)
—
20 Dexc 1 (5.0)
0.11 (0.02-0.80) ▁▁▁▆

Liu 2022b

60 Plac CAM 5 8 (13.3)
—
60 Dex 5 (8.3)
0.62 (0.22-1.80) ▁▆▆▁
GI/Abd

Lu 2021

331 Plac CAM Noted 43 (13.0)e
—
344 Dex 41 (11.9)e
0.92 (0.61-1.37) ▁▆▆▁

Xin 2021

30 Plac CAM 7 10 (33.3)
—
30 Dex 3 (10.0)
0.30 (0.09-0.98) ▆▁▆▁

Xie 2023

119 Plac CAM 7 12 (10.1)
—
117 Dexc 4 (3.4)
0.34 (0.11-1.02) ▁▁▁▆
ENT

Liu 2023c

149 Plac CAM 5 36 (24.2)
—
150 Dex 32 (21.3)
0.88 (0.58-1.34) ▁▁▆▁
GI: gastrointestinal; Abd: abdominal (includes hepatic); Ortho: orthopedic; Various: more that one procedure category; Oralmax: oral and maxillofacial; Ophtho; ophthalmologic; Urol: urologic; RR: risk ratio; Dex: dexmedetomidine; Mid: midazolam; Prop: propofol; Preg: pregabalin; Plac: placebo; DSM: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; ICDSC: Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist; Psych: psychiatrist interview; Nu-DESC: Nursing Delirium Screening Scale; NS: not specified.
a Day(s) over which incidence proportion assessed. Stay indicates duration of hospitalization.
b Bars indicate adminstration times from left to right: preoperative, induction, intraoperative, and postoperative (includes PACU).
c Postoperative dexmedetomidine only.
d Reported only daily incidence.
e Maximum of reported daily incidence.
f Primary outcome was delirium on postoperative day 1 — OR 0.32 (95% CI, 0.10–0.83)
g Tool reported in the `Chinese Expert Consensus on the Prevention and Treatment of Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients.'

Ketamine

Table 17. Delirium incidence and days of ascertainment during hospitalization in ketamine studies.

Study  N Arm Scale Day(s)a Incidence Proportion RR (95% CI)
N (%) 0 – 100%
Cardiac - Randomized Clinical Trial

Hudetz 2009b

29 Plac ICDSC 5 9 (31.0)
—
29 Ket 1 (3.4)
0.11 (0.02-0.82)

Siripoonyothai 2021

32 Prop CAM 1 18 (56.2)
—
32 Ket 10 (31.2)
0.56 (0.31-1.01)
Ortho - Prospective Cohort

Juliebo 2009

119 None CAM 5 38 (31.9)
—
68 Ket 30 (44.1)
1.38 (0.95-2.01)
Various - Randomized Clinical Trial

Avidan 2017

222 Plac CAM 3 43 (19.4)
—
227 Ket 39 (17.2)
0.89 (0.60-1.31)
223 Ket 46 (20.6)
1.06 (0.73-1.54)

Hollinger 2021

44 Plac ICDSC 3 4 (9.1)
—
45 Hal 5 (11.1)
1.22 (0.35-4.25)
47 Ket 3 (6.4)
0.70 (0.17-2.96)
Ortho - Retrospective Cohort

Weinstein 2018c

31,796 None ICD Stay 713 (2.2)
—
4,070 Ket 84 (2.1)
0.92 (0.74-1.15)

Weinstein 2018d

36,852 None ICD Stay 771 (2.1)
—
99 Ket 13 (13.1)
6.28 (3.76-10.47)

Memtsoudis 2019b

538,559 None Otherb Stay 14,082 (2.6)
—
25,667 Ket 703 (2.7)
1.05 (0.97-1.13)

Memtsoudis 2019g

1,081,139 None Otherb Stay 30,978 (2.9)
—
49,430 Ket 1,406 (2.8)
0.99 (0.94-1.05)

Poeran 2020d

468,004 None ICD Stay 72,998 (15.6)
—
37,148 Ket 6,549 (17.6)
1.13 (1.10-1.16)
Thoracic - Retrospective Cohort

Fuchita 2019c

74 None CAM Stay 24 (32.4)
—
10 Ket 3 (30.0)
0.92 (0.34-2.52)
Spine - Prospective Cohort

Barreto Chang 2022

38 None CAM/ICDSC Stay 7 (18.4)
—
60 Ket 19 (31.7)
1.72 (0.80-3.70)
Other - Prospective Cohort

Ke 2022b

92 None Nu-DESC Stay 10 (10.9)
—
6 Ket 1 (16.7)
1.53 (0.23-10.07)
GI/Abd - Randomized Clinical Trial

Ma 2023

31 Plac CAM NA 4 (12.9)
—
31 Ket 3 (9.7)
0.75 (0.18-3.08)
RR: risk ratio; Ket: ketamine; Plac: placebo; Prop: propofol; Hal: haloperidol; ICDSC: Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist; CAM: Confusion Assessment Method; Nu-DESC: Nursing Delirium Screening Scale; ICD: ICD codes.
a Days over which incidence assessed. Stay indicates duration of hospital stay.
b Claims-based algorithm.

Melatonin/Ramelteon

Table 18. Delirium incidence and days of ascertainment during hospitalization in melatonin and ramelteon studies.

Study  N Arm Scale Day(s)a Incidence Proportion RR (95% CI)
N (%) 0 – 100%
Cardiac - Randomized Clinical Trial

Dianatkhah 2015

71 Oxaz Clinical Stay 9 (12.7)
—
66 Mel 4 (6.1)
0.48 (0.15-1.48)

El-Naggar 2018

25 Plac ICDSC 3 7 (28.0)
—
25 Mel 2 (8.0)
0.29 (0.07-1.24)

Ford 2020

104 Plac CAM/DSM 7 21 (20.2)
—
98 Mel 21 (21.4)
1.06 (0.62-1.82)

Javaherforoosh 2021

30 Plac CAM Noteb 14 (46.7)
—
30 Mel 4 (13.3)
0.29 (0.11-0.77)

Shi 2021

149 Plac CAM 7 59 (39.6)
—
148 Mel 40 (27.0)
0.68 (0.49-0.95)
Ortho - Randomized Clinical Trial

Sultan 2010

49 None AMT 3 16 (32.7)
—
50 Mid 22 (44.0)
1.35 (0.81-2.24)
53 Mel 5 (9.4)
0.29 (0.11-0.73)

de Jonghe 2014

192 Plac DSM 8 49 (25.5)
—
186 Mel 55 (29.6)
1.16 (0.83-1.61)

Oh 2021

39 Plac CAM/DRS/DSM 2 2 (5.1)
—
41 Ram 3 (7.3)
1.43 (0.25-8.09)

Fazel 2022

36 Plac AMT Noteb 16 (44.4)
—
36 Mel 8 (22.2)
0.50 (0.25-1.02)

Mohamed 2022

40 Plac AMT 3 21 (52.5)
—
40 Mel 10 (25.0)
0.48 (0.26-0.88)
Various - Randomized Clinical Trial

Gupta 2019

50 Plac CAM 3 6 (12.0)
—
50 Ram 2 (4.0)
0.33 (0.07-1.57)

Esmaeii 2022

49 None AMT Noteb 10 (20.4)
—
51 Mel 4 (7.8)
0.38 (0.13-1.14)
Thoracic - Randomized Clinical Trial

Jaiswal 2019

58 Plac CAM Stay 22 (37.9)
—
59 Ram 19 (32.2)
0.85 (0.52-1.39)
GI/Abd - Before-After/Time Series

Hokuto 2020

186 None DSM 7 28 (15.1)
—
120 Ram 7 (5.8)
0.39 (0.17-0.86)
Thoracic - Before-After/Time Series

Miyata 2017

58 None ICDSC 9 5 (8.6)
—
24 Ram 0 (0)
Not estimated
Cardiac - Nonrandomized Trial

Artemiou 2015

250 None CAM Stay 52 (20.8)
—
250 Mel 21 (8.4)
0.40 (0.25-0.65)

Bily 2015

250 None CAM Stay 52 (20.8)
—
250 Mel 21 (8.4)
0.40 (0.25-0.65)
Headneck - Retrospective Cohort

Ishibashi-Kanno 2020a

34 None DSM Stay 12 (35.3)
—
35 Ram 11 (31.4)
0.89 (0.46-1.74)
GI/Abd - Randomized Clinical Trial

Tanifuji 2022

19 Plac CAM 7 4 (21.1)
—
23 Ram 1 (4.3)
0.21 (0.03-1.70)
RR: risk ratio; MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination; Mel: melatonin; Ram: ramelteon; Dex: dexmedetomidine; Oxaz: oxazepam; Mid: midazolam; AMT: Abbreviated Mental Test; DRS: Delirium Rating Scale; DSM: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; CAM: Confusion Assessment Method; ICDSC: Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist.
a Day(s) over which incidence proportion assessed. Stay indicates duration of hospitalization.
b Reported only daily incidence.

Pooled

Dexmedetomidine

Figure 2. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention.

Dex: dexmedetomidine; Plac: placebo; RR: risk ratio; D1: bias arising from the randomization process; D2: bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D3: bias due to missing outcome data; D4: bias in measurement of the outcome; D5: bias in selection of the reported result: All: overall risk of bias.
Risk of bias ratings: low +, some concerns ?, high – .
Harbord test for small study effects P = 0.00006.
Delirium a designated primary outcome in 71.0%; a secondary outcome in 12.9%.
Excluding Turan 2020: RR 0.56 (95% CI, 0.49-0.64; I 2 = 13%, \(\tau\)2 = 0.04.
*Trials conducted in China.

Meta-analysis methods detail.

- Mantel-Haenszel method (common effect model)
- Inverse variance method (random effects model)
- Restricted maximum-likelihood estimator for τ2
- Q-Profile method for confidence interval of τ2 and τ
- Hartung-Knapp adjustment for random effects model (df = 31)
- Hartung-Knapp prediction interval (df = 30)

Figure 3. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention — China vs. other countries.

Dex: dexmedetomidine; Plac: placebo; RR: risk ratio; D1: bias arising from the randomization process; D2: bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D3: bias due to missing outcome data; D4: bias in measurement of the outcome; D5: bias in selection of the reported result: All: overall risk of bias.
Risk of bias ratings: low +, some concerns ?, high – .
Meta-regression (China vs. Other), I 2 = 38%.

Figure 4. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention — small study effects.

Estimates from random effects models — unadjusted OR 0.50 (95% CI, 0.41–0.61); adjusted for small study effects in a limit meta-analysis OR 0.78 (95% CI, 0.55–1.11).
*Trials conducted in China.

Figure 5. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention — significance funnel plots.

All Trials

Trials conducted outside China

Black diamond represents pooled estimate for all studies and the grey for only non-affirmative ones (p>0.05). For the entire set of included trials, achieving a non-significant result would require affirmative studies >50 times more like to be published and unlikely plausible (see Mathur 2024 and Mathur 2020). For trials conducted outside of China, the pooled result for non-affirmative trials is null.

Figure 6. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention — small study effects for trials conducted in China.

Estimates from random effects models — unadjusted OR 0.46 (95% CI, 0.38–0.56); adjusted for small study effects in a limit meta-analysis OR 0.67 (95% CI, 0.46–0.99).
Harbord test for small study effects P = 0.0001.

Figure 7. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention — small study effects in trials conducted outside of China.

Estimates from random effects models — unadjusted OR 0.61 (95% CI, 0.38–0.99); adjusted for small study effects in a limit meta-analysis OR 1.11 (95% CI, 0.58–2.14).
Harbord test for small study effects P = 0.0021.

Figure 8. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention — postoperative administration only or at other times.

Dex: dexmedetomidine; Plac: placebo; RR: risk ratio; D1: bias arising from the randomization process; D2: bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D3: bias due to missing outcome data; D4: bias in measurement of the outcome; D5: bias in selection of the reported result: All: overall risk of bias.
Risk of bias ratings: low +, some concerns ?, high – .
*Trials conducted in China.

Figure 9. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention — any postoperative administration or at other times.

Dex: dexmedetomidine; Plac: placebo; RR: risk ratio; D1: bias arising from the randomization process; D2: bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D3: bias due to missing outcome data; D4: bias in measurement of the outcome; D5: bias in selection of the reported result: All: overall risk of bias.
Risk of bias ratings: low +, some concerns ?, high – .
*Trials conducted in China.

Figure 10. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention — by surgical category.


Orthopedic

Various

Cardiac

Thoracic

GI/Abdominal

Dex: dexmedetomidine; Plac: placebo; RR: risk ratio; D1: bias arising from the randomization process; D2: bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D3: bias due to missing outcome data; D4: bias in measurement of the outcome; D5: bias in selection of the reported result: All: overall risk of bias.
Risk of bias ratings: low +, some concerns ?, high – .
Hartung-Knapp adjustment not applied owing to < 5 trials in some subgroups.
*Trials conducted in China.

Figure 11. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention — according to risk of bias appraisal.

Dex: dexmedetomidine; Plac: placebo; RR: risk ratio; D1: bias arising from the randomization process; D2: bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D3: bias due to missing outcome data; D4: bias in measurement of the outcome; D5: bias in selection of the reported result: All: overall risk of bias.
Risk of bias ratings: low +, some concerns ?, high – .
*Trials conducted in China.

Figure 12. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention — according to reporting incidence proportion.

Dex: dexmedetomidine; Plac: placebo; RR: risk ratio; D1: bias arising from the randomization process; D2: bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D3: bias due to missing outcome data; D4: bias in measurement of the outcome; D5: bias in selection of the reported result: All: overall risk of bias.
Risk of bias ratings: low +, some concerns ?, high – .
Hartung-Knapp adjustment not applied.
*Trials conducted in China.

Figure 13. Placebo delirium incidence proportion and relative effects (standard and Bayesian meta-regression models).

Bubble plot of control arm/baseline delirium risk and odds ratios. Bubble size proportional to the number of patients. The red dashed line represents the pooled risk ratio. Obtained from a standard meta-regression.


Similar plot for odds ratios obtained from a Bayesian meta-regression (fitted using Stan and multinma).


Figure 14. Risk ratios according to baseline risk subgroups (placebo delirium incidence proportion) — <15%, 15% to 30%, and >30%.

Figure 15. Summary risk of bias from randomized clinical trials of dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention (delirium, weighted).

   Subgroups

Figure 16. Summary of subgroup results.

Dex: dexmedetomidine; Plac: placebo; RR: risk ratio.

Ketamine

Figure 17. Ketamine compared with placebo (randomized clinical trials).

D1: bias arising from the randomization process; D2: bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D3: bias due to missing outcome data; D4: bias in measurement of the outcome; D5: bias in selection of the reported result: All: overall risk of bias.
Risk of bias ratings: low +, some concerns ?, high – .


Figure 18. Ketamine compared with placebo (non-randomized studies).

D1: Bias due to confounding; D2: Bias in selection of participants into the study; D3: Bias in classification of interventions; D4: Bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D5: Bias due to missing data; D6: Bias in measurement of outcomes; D7: Bias in selection of reported results; All: overall risk of bias.
Risk of bias ratings: low ++, moderate +, serious -, critical - - ; NI: no information; NA: not applicable.
Confidence intervals may not exactly match published; variances were calculated from rounded figures as reported.
Multilevel model accounting for within-study dependent effects.
Weinstein 2018c intraoperative ketamine; Weinstein 2018d postoperative ketamine; Memtsoudis 2019b hip arthroplasty; Memtsoudis 2019g total knee arthroplasty.

Figure 19. Ketamine versus none non-randomized designs small study effects (funnel plot).

Melatonin/Ramelteon

Figure 20. Melatonin and ramelteon compared with placebo or no intervention.

Mel: melatonin; Ram: ramelteon; D1: bias arising from the randomization process; D2: bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D3: bias due to missing outcome data; D4: bias in measurement of the outcome; D5: bias in selection of the reported result: All: overall risk of bias.

Risk of bias ratings: low +, some concerns ?, high – .

Harbord test for small study effects P = 0.03.

Delirium a designated primary outcome in 100.0%.

Figure 21. Melatonin or ramelteon compared with placebo or no intervention — small study effects.
quartz_off_screen 
                2 

Estimates (odds ratio and 95% CI) from random effects models — unadjusted OR 0.50 (0.32–0.78); adjusted for small study effects OR 0.78 (0.40–1.51).

Figure 22. Melatonin or ramelteon compared with placebo or no intervention — significance funnel plot.

Black diamond represents pooled estimate for all studies and the grey for only non-affirmative ones (p>0.05). To achieve a non-significant result, would require affirmative studies 2.9 times more like to be published (see Mathur 2020) and the pooled result from non-affirmative studies does not appear to yield a clinically substantive decrease in risk.

Figure 23. Ramelteon compared with placebo (before-after studies).

D1: Bias due to confounding; D2: Bias in selection of participants into the study; D3: Bias in classification of interventions; D4: Bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D5: Bias due to missing data; D6: Bias in measurement of outcomes; D7: Bias in selection of reported results; All: overall risk of bias.
Risk of bias ratings: low ++, moderate +, serious -, critical - - ; NI: no information; NA: not applicable.


Network

Table 19. Summary of studies included in the network for delirium incidence.
Characteristic Value
Number of Interventions 7
Number of Studies 61
Total Number of Patients in Network 12,550
Total Possible Pairwise Comparisons 21
Total Number of Pairwise Comparisons With Direct Data 8
Is the network connected? TRUE
Number of Two-arm Studies 61
Number of Multi-Arms Studies 0
Total Number of Events in Network 1,997
Number of Studies With No Zero Events 61
Number of Studies With At Least One Zero Event 0
Number of Studies with All Zero Events 0
Table 20. Summary of events by comparisons in the network for delirium incidence.
Comparison Studies Patients Events (%)
Benzo vs. Dex 3 192 26 (13.5)
Benzo vs. Mel 1 137 13 (9.5)
Dex vs. Plac/None 32 7,774 1,123 (14.4)
Dex vs. Prop 7 1,834 234 (12.8)
Ket vs. Plac/None 4 878 152 (17.3)
Ket vs. Prop 1 64 28 (43.8)
Mel vs. Plac/None 9 1,341 362 (27.0)
Plac/None vs. Ram 4 330 59 (17.9)



Figure 24. Network structure of randomized clinical trials and comparators reporting delirium incidence.

Dex: dexmedetomidine; Ket: ketamine; Mel/Ram: melatonin or ramelteon; Benz: benzodiazepine (midazolam or oxazepam); Plac/None: placebo or no intervention; Prop: propofol.


Figure 25. Network meta-analysis of delirium incidence including all comparators.

Dex: Dexmedetomidine; Ket: Ketamine; Mel/Ram: Melatonin or Ramelteon; Benzo: Benzodiazepine; Prop: Propofol; Plac/None: Placebo or no comparator.


Table 21. League table of risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals from network meta-analysis of delirium incidence (random effects model). Comparisons from direct evidence displayed in the upper diagonal; network comparisons shown on the lower diagonal.

Dex

0.26
(0.09, 0.71)

0.55
(0.40, 0.77)

0.58
(0.50, 0.68)

0.81
(0.51, 1.29)

Ket

0.56
(0.25, 1.25)

0.78
(0.46, 1.32)

0.89
(0.66, 1.20)

1.10
(0.65, 1.86)

Mel/Ram

0.48
(0.14, 1.67)

0.64
(0.50, 0.83)

0.31
(0.14, 0.70)

0.39
(0.16, 0.97)

0.35
(0.16, 0.79)

Benzo

0.54
(0.39, 0.74)

0.66
(0.40, 1.10)

0.60
(0.39, 0.92)

1.71
(0.72, 4.02)

Prop

0.58
(0.50, 0.68)

0.72
(0.46, 1.13)

0.65
(0.51, 0.84)

1.85
(0.83, 4.13)

1.09
(0.77, 1.53)

Plac/None

Dex: Dexmedetomidine; Ket: Ketamine; Mel/Ram: Melatonin or Ramelteon; Mid: Midazolam; MS: Morphine; Prop: Propofol; Plac/None: Placebo or no comparator.
Figure 26. Comparison-adjusted funnel plot for delirium.

Figure 27. Comparison of direct and indirect evidence in network meta-analysis of delirium (node splitting forest plot).

Dex: Dexmedetomidine; Ket: Ketamine; Mel/Ram: Melatonin/Ramelteon; Mid: Midazolam; MS: Morphine; Prop: Propofol; Plac/None: Placebo or no comparator.


Neurocognitive Disorder
  <30 days

Dexmedetomidine

Table 22. Neurocognitive disorder <30 days incidence and ascertainment in trials of dexmedetomidine (includes only trials conducting cognitive testing at day 3 or later).

Study  N Drug Preop Instrument Dayb Neurocognitive Disorder <30 days
MMSEa MMSE DST MoCA Other N (%) 0 — 100% RR (95% CI)
GI/Abd - Randomized Clinical Trial

Mohamed 2014

25 Plac

✓

7 5 (20.0)
—
25 Dex
6 (24.0)
1.20 (0.42-3.43)

Chen 2020

45 Plac

29.3 (0.4)

✓c

3 29 (64.4)
—
43 Dex

29.4 (0.5)

7 (16.3)
0.25 (0.12-0.51)

Li 2021b

30 Plac

28.7 (2.1)

✓d

7 12 (40.0)
—
30 Dex

27.6 (3.2)

11 (36.7)
0.92 (0.48-1.74)
30 Dex

28.0 (1.7)

4 (13.3)
0.33 (0.12-0.92)
30 Dex

28.4 (2.6)

2 (6.7)
0.17 (0.04-0.68)

Guo 2022

45 None

✓e

7 6 (13.3)
—
45 Dex
4 (8.9)
0.67 (0.20-2.20)

Liao 2023

35 Plac

27.7 (1.9)

✓

✓

3 10 (28.6)
—
34 Rem

27.7 (1.7)

3 (8.8)
0.31 (0.09-1.03)
35 Dex

27.8 (2.1)

3 (8.6)
0.30 (0.09-1.00)
Cardiac - Randomized Clinical Trial

Zhou 2019b

38 Plac

✓f

7 12 (31.6)
—
39 Ulin
7 (17.9)
0.57 (0.25-1.29)
39 Dex/Ulin
4 (10.3)
0.32 (0.11-0.92)
38 Dex
6 (15.8)
0.50 (0.21-1.19)

Gao 2020

30 Plac

✓g

7 5 (16.7)
—
30 Dex
0 (0)
Not estimated

Racman 2023

34 Prop

26 {25-28}

✓

3 20 (58.8)
—
37 Dex

27 {25-28}

9 (24.3)
0.41 (0.22-0.78)
Various - Randomized Clinical Trial

Wang 2019

100 Mid

25.0 (3.3)

✓h

7 28 (28.0)
—
98 Dex

24.9 (3.9)

24 (24.5)
0.87 (0.55-1.40)

Chawdhary 2020

40 Prop

26.4 (1.3)

✓i

7 11 (27.5)
—
40 Dex

26.1 (1.2)

8 (20.0)
0.73 (0.33-1.62)

Zhao 2020

101 None

27 {24-30}

✓j

7 10 (9.9)
—
108 Dex

27 {24-30}

14 (13.0)
1.31 (0.61-2.81)
105 Dex

27 {24-30}

5 (4.8)
0.48 (0.17-1.36)
102 Dex

27 {24-30}

2 (2.0)
0.20 (0.04-0.88)
Ortho - Randomized Clinical Trial

Lu 2017

76 Dex

28.3 (1.3)

✓j

7 13 (17.1)
—
75 Dex

28.5 (1.2)

5 (6.7)
0.39 (0.15-1.04)

Li 2019

55 Prop

✓f

✓

7 10 (18.2)
—
54 Mid
28 (51.9)
2.85 (1.54-5.28)
55 Dex
22 (40.0)
2.20 (1.15-4.20)

Zhao 2023

42 Plac

25.8 (0.6)

✓

3 16 (38.1)
—
40 Dex

25.9 (0.4)

7 (17.5)
0.46 (0.21-1.00)
Ophtho - Randomized Clinical Trial

Mansouri 2019

50 Plac

✓k

7 10 (20.0)
—
50 Mid
6 (12.0)
0.60 (0.24-1.53)
50 Dex
6 (12.0)
0.60 (0.24-1.53)
Thoracic - Randomized Clinical Trial

Shi 2020

53 Plac

28.0 (0.9)

✓l

7 19 (35.8)
—
53 Dex

27.9 (0.9)

7 (13.2)
0.37 (0.17-0.80)
Urol - Randomized Clinical Trial

Ding 2015

20 Plac

✓d

✓d

5 4 (20.0)
—
20 Dex
1 (5.0)
0.25 (0.03-2.05)
GI/Abd - Nonrandomized Trial

Xu 2017

48 Plac

✓

7 0 (0)
—
48 Dex
0 (0)
Not estimated

Zhang 2019b

60 Plac

28.9 (1.2)

✓

3 8 (13.3)
—
80 Dex

28.9 (1.2)

0 (0)
Not estimated
Mini-Mental State Exam; DST: Digit Span Test; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; RR: risk ratio; Dex: Dexmedetomidine; Mid: Midazolam; Prop: Propofol; Ulin: ulinastatin; Plac/None: placebo or no intervention.
a Mean Med (SD)[Range]{IQR}.
b Day of assessment.
c MMSE <24.
d Difference from baseline ≥1 SD.
e Not specified.
f Z ≥1.96.
g American Psychiatric Association postoperative cognitive dysfunction diagnostic criteria.
h Threshold not specified.
i Difference from baseline ≥2 SD.
j Difference from baseline >2 pts.
k MMSE <26.
l Z >2.

Ketamine

Table 23. Neurocognitive disorder <30 days incidence and ascertainment in randomized clinical trials of ketamine (includes only trials conducting cognitive testing at day 3 or later).

Study  N Drug Preop Instrument Dayb,b Neurocognitive Disorder <30 days
MMSEa,a MMSE DST MoCA Other N (%) 0 — 100% RR (95% CI)
GI/Abd - Randomized Clinical Trial

Han 2023

34 Plac

27.9 (1.6)

✓

7 13 (38.2)
—
33 Ket

28.6 (1.1)

5 (15.2)
0.40 (0.16-0.99)

Ma 2023

31 Plac

✓

3 12 (38.7)
—
31 Ket
5 (16.1)
0.42 (0.17-1.04)
Various - Randomized Clinical Trial

Hollinger 2021

44 Plac

28.3 (2.3)

✓c

3 6 (13.6)
—
45 Hal

28.0 (1.3)

7 (15.6)
1.14 (0.42-3.13)
47 Ket

27.7 (1.7)

10 (21.3)
1.56 (0.62-3.93)
Cardiac - Randomized Clinical Trial

Hudetz 2009a

26 Plac

✓

7 21 (80.8)
—
26 Ket
7 (26.9)
0.33 (0.17-0.65)
Ortho - Randomized Clinical Trial

Lee 2015

26 Plac

26 {24-28}

✓d

6 0 (0)
—
25 Ket

25 {24-28}

1 (4.0)
Not estimated
Mini-Mental State Exam; DST: Digit Span Test; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; RR: risk ratio; Ket: ketamine; Hal: haloperidol; Plac: placebo.
Mini-Mental State Exam; DST: Digit Span Test; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; RR: risk ratio; Dex: Dexmedetomidine; Mid: Midazolam; Prop: Propofol; Ulin: ulinastatin; Plac/None: placebo or no intervention.
a Mean Med (SD)[Range]{IQR}.
b Day of assessment.
c MMSE <24.
d Z ≥1.96.

Melatonin/Ramelteon

No studies

Pooled

Dexmedetomidine

Figure 28. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention (randomized clinical trials, neurocognitive disorder <30 days assessed on postoperative day 5 or later).

Dex: dexmedetomidine; Plac: placebo; RR: risk ratio; D1: bias arising from the randomization process; D2: bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D3: bias due to missing outcome data; D4: bias in measurement of the outcome; D5: bias in selection of the reported result: All: overall risk of bias.
Risk of bias ratings: low +, some concerns ?, high – .
Neurocognitive recovery a designated primary outcome in 19.4%; a secondary outcome in 6.5%.
*Trials conducted in China.

Figure 29. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention according to risk of bias appraisals (randomized clinical trials; neurocognitive disorder <30 days).

Dex: dexmedetomidine; Plac: placebo; RR: risk ratio; D1: bias arising from the randomization process; D2: bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D3: bias due to missing outcome data; D4: bias in measurement of the outcome; D5: bias in selection of the reported result: All: overall risk of bias.
Risk of bias ratings: low +, some concerns ?, high – .
0.5 added to cells of studies without events in one arm.

Figure 30. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention small study effects — funnel plot (neurocognitive disorder <30 days).

Figure 31. Summary risk of bias from randomized clinical trials of dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention (neurocognitive disorder <30 days, weighted).

Ketamine

Figure 32. Ketamine compared with placebo or no intervention (randomized clinical trials, delayed neurocognitive recovery).

Plac: placebo; RR: risk ratio; D1: bias arising from the randomization process; D2: bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D3: bias due to missing outcome data; D4: bias in measurement of the outcome; D5: bias in selection of the reported result: All: overall risk of bias.
Risk of bias ratings: low +, some concerns ?, high – .
Too few studies to examine small study effects.

Network

Table 24. Summary of studies included in the network for neurocognitive disorder <30 days.
Characteristic Value
Number of Interventions 5
Number of Studies 15
Total Number of Patients in Network 1,720
Total Possible Pairwise Comparisons 10
Total Number of Pairwise Comparisons With Direct Data 6
Is the network connected? TRUE
Number of Two-arm Studies 13
Number of Multi-Arms Studies 2
Total Number of Events in Network 335
Number of Studies With No Zero Events 13
Number of Studies With At Least One Zero Event 2
Number of Studies with All Zero Events 0
Table 25. Summary of events by comparisons in the network for neurocognitive disorder <30 days.
Comparison Studies Patients Events (%)
Dex vs. Mid 3 407 114 (28.0)
Dex vs. Plac 9 1,058 151 (14.3)
Dex vs. Prop 2 190 51 (26.8)
Ket vs. Plac 3 170 47 (27.6)
Mid vs. Plac 1 100 16 (16.0)
Mid vs. Prop 1 109 38 (34.9)



Figure 33. Network structure of randomized clinical trials and comparators reporting neurocognitive disorder <30 days.

Dex: Dexmedetomidine; Ket: ketamine; Mid: midazolam; Prop: propofol; Plac: Placebo or no intervention; Prop: Propofol.
Zhao 2020 no intervention (usual care) arm included as placebo.


Figure 34. Network meta-analysis of neurocognitive disorder <30 days including all comparators.

Dex: Dexmedetomidine; Ket: ketamine; Mid: midazolam; Prop: propofol; Plac: Placebo or no intervention; Prop: Propofol.


Table 26. League table of risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals from network meta-analysis of neurocognitive disorder <30 days (random effects model). Comparisons from direct evidence displayed in the upper diagonal; network comparisons shown on the lower diagonal.

Dex

0.83
(0.62, 1.12)

1.42
(0.86, 2.34)

0.54
(0.40, 0.73)

1.41
(0.77, 2.58)

Ket

0.38
(0.22, 0.64)

0.78
(0.58, 1.04)

0.55
(0.29, 1.07)

Mid

2.85
(1.54, 5.28)

0.60
(0.24, 1.53)

1.49
(0.91, 2.43)

1.06
(0.49, 2.30)

1.91
(1.15, 3.17)

Prop

0.53
(0.39, 0.71)

0.38
(0.22, 0.64)

0.68
(0.46, 1.01)

0.36
(0.20, 0.63)

Plac

Dex: Dexmedetomidine; Ket: ketamine; Mid: midazolam; Prop: propofol; Ulin: ulinastatin; Prop: Propofol; Plac/None: Placebo or no intervention.
Figure 35. Comparison-adjusted funnel plot for neurocognitive disorder <30 days.

Figure 36. Comparison of direct and indirect evidence in network meta-analysis of neurocognitive disorder <30 days (node splitting forest plot).

Dex: Dexmedetomidine; Ket: Ketamine; Mel/Ram: Melatonin/Ramelteon; Mid: Midazolam; MS: Morphine; Prop: Propofol; Plac/None: Placebo or no comparator.

Neurocognitive Disorder
  30 days to 1 year

Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, and Melatonin

Table 27. Neurocognitive disorder 30 days to 1 year and ascertainment.

Study  N Drug Preop Instrument Dayb Neurocognitive Disorder 30 days to 1 yr
MMSEa MMSE DST MoCA Other N (%) 0 — 100% RR (95% CI)
Randomized Clinical Trial

de Jonghe 2014

151 Plac

23 {10-28}

✓

90 105 (69.5)
—
147 Mel

23 {12-29}

87 (59.2)
0.85 (0.72-1.01)

Li 2019

55 Prop

✓c

365 5 (9.1)
—
54 Mid
7 (13.0)
1.43 (0.48-4.22)
55 Dex
6 (10.9)
1.20 (0.39-3.70)

Wang 2019

100 Mid

25.0 (3.3)

✓d

90 7 (7.0)
—
98 Dex

24.9 (3.9)

9 (9.2)
1.31 (0.51-3.38)

Gao 2021

20 Plac

28.4 (1.3)

✓

90 2 (10.0)
—
20 Dex

28.5 (1.4)

0 (0)
Not estimated

Han 2023

34 Plac

27.9 (1.6)

✓

90 5 (14.7)
—
33 Ket

28.6 (1.1)

2 (6.1)
0.41 (0.09-1.98)

Oriby 2023

30 Plac

✓e

90f 20 (66.7)
—
30 Ket
7 (23.3)
0.35 (0.17-0.70)
30 Dex
5 (16.7)
0.25 (0.11-0.58)
Mini-Mental State Exam; DST: Digit Span Test; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; RR: risk ratio; Dex: dexmedetomidine: Mel: melatonin; Plac: placebo.
a Mean Med (SD)[Range]{IQR}.
b Day of assessment.
c Z ≥1.96.
d Threshold not specified.
e Failed at least 2 of Visual Verbal Learning Tests, Stroop color word test, Letter Digit Coding Test, or Concept Shifting Test
f Assumed to be 90 days based on time of final reported neuropsychological assessment.

Pooled

Dexmedetomidine

Figure 37. Neurocognitive disorder 30 days to 1 year comparing dexmedetomidine with placebo.

Ketamine

Figure 38. Neurocognitive disorder 30 days to 1 year comparing ketamine with placebo.

Network (exploratory)

Exploratory network meta-analysis

 

Excludes midazolam and propofol arms as neither contributed (ie, not in a closed loops).

Physical Function

Table 28. Physical functional status following dexmedetomidine and melatonin for delirium prophylaxis.

Study N Arm     Agea Scale Range Days Ratinga SMD (95% CI)
30-90 days

de Jonghe 2014

192 Plac

83.4 (7.5)

Katz ADL score 15→0 90

9 [5-13]

186 Mel

84.1 (8.0)

9 [5-13]

 0.00 (-0.20 to 0.20)
>90 days

Chitnis 2022

31 Prop

78.8

SF-36 physical 0→100 182.5

73.7

30 Dex

78.7

76.1

0.39 (-1.57 to 2.34)
SMD: standardized mean difference
a Mean Med (SD)[Range]{IQR}.

Complications

Dexmedetomidine

Bradycardia

Table 29. Bradycardia in randomized and nonrandomized dexmedetomidine clinical trials.

Study  N Arm     Age Surgery N (%) 0 – 100% RD (95% CI) Criteria
Randomized Clinical Trial

Chen 2020

45 Plac

65.4 (11.7)

GI/Abd 4 (8.9)
— <40 bpm
43 Dex

64.9 (11.4)

1 (2.3)
-6.6% (-16.0, 2.9)

Hu 2021

87 Plac

69.1 (5.1)

Thoracic 0 (0)
— <40 bpm
90 Dex

69.6 (4.5)

0 (0)
0.0% (-2.2, 2.2)

Guo 2015

73 Plac

71.3 (5.1)

Oralmax 2 (2.7)
— <50 bpm
76 Dex

70.7 (5.2)

5 (6.6)
3.8% (-2.9, 10.6)

Wang 2020a

20 Mid

60.5 (8.2)

Oralmax 2 (10.0)
— <50 bpm
20 Dex

60.0 (10.1)

8 (40.0)
30.0% (4.8, 55.2)

Hong 2021

354 Plac

71.0 (5.0)

Ortho 1 (0.3)
— <50 bpm
356 Dex

71.0 (5.0)

1 (0.3)
-0.0% (-0.8, 0.8)

Lu 2021

331 Plac

70.4 (6.5)

GI/Abd 12 (3.6)
— <50 bpm
344 Dex

70.1 (5.8)

22 (6.4)
2.8% (-0.5, 6.0)

Xie 2023

119 Plac

68.6 (5.5)

GI/Abd 12 (10.1)
— <50 bpm
117 Dex

67.9 (5.6)

11 (9.4)
-0.7% (-8.2, 6.9)

Shi 2020

53 Plac

68.7 (3.4)

Thoracic 13 (24.5)
— <55 bpm
53 Dex

68.7 (4.6)

26 (49.1)
24.5% (6.8, 42.3)

Zhang 2020a

120 Plac

79.0 (6.8)

Ortho 18 (15.0)
— <60 bpm
120 Dex

78.1 (6.4)

20 (16.7)
1.7% (-7.6, 10.9)

Li 2017

143 Plac

67.5 (5.3)

Cardiac 14 (9.8)
— <45 bpm or ↓30%
142 Dex

66.4 (5.4)

21 (14.8)
5.0% (-2.6, 12.6)

Lee 2018b

31 Plac

67.2 (5.0)

Ortho 7 (22.6)
— <45 bpm or ↓30%
33 Preg

68.4 (5.1)

8 (24.2)
1.7% (-19.1, 22.4)
29 Dex/Preg

65.4 (9.7)

19 (65.5)
42.9% (20.2, 65.6)
31 Dex

68.8 (5.9)

19 (61.3)
38.7% (16.1, 61.3)

Zhao 2023

42 Plac

69.7 (7.2)

Ortho 3 (7.1)
— ↓25%
40 Dex

70.9 (7.2)

7 (17.5)
10.4% (-3.8, 24.5)

Wu 2020

40 Plac

67.7 (8.8)

Cardiac 2 (5.0)
— NR
40 Dex

68.2 (8.6)

1 (2.5)
-2.5% (-10.8, 5.8)

Zhao 2020

101 None

69.2 (4.1)

Various 3 (3.0)
— NR
108 Dex

70.0 (4.5)

8 (7.4)
4.4% (-1.5, 10.4)
105 Dex

69.4 (3.9)

8 (7.6)
4.6% (-1.4, 10.7)
102 Dex

69.3 (4.1)

8 (7.8)
4.9% (-1.3, 11.1)

Li 2021b

30 Plac

73.4 (5.1)

GI/Abd 7 (23.3)
— NR
30 Dex

74.7 (2.6)

8 (26.7)
3.3% (-18.6, 25.2)
30 Dex

71.2 (3.5)

12 (40.0)
16.7% (-6.5, 39.8)
30 Dex

69.8 (4.3)

20 (66.7)
43.3% (20.7, 66.0)

van Norden 2021

32 Plac

70.5 (6.2)

Various 19 (59.4)
— NR
28 Dex

70.4 (7.1)

17 (60.7)
1.3% (-23.5, 26.2)

Lv 2022

157 Plac

68.4 (6.6)

Various 9 (5.7)
— NR
152 Dex

67.9 (5.9)

16 (10.5)
4.8% (-1.3, 10.9)

Li 2023

49 None

68.5 (2.2)

Ortho 1 (2.0)
— NR
49 Dex

67.7 (2.8)

1 (2.0)
0.0% (-5.6, 5.6)

Liao 2023

35 Plac

69.7 (2.5)

GI/Abd 2 (5.7)
— NR
34 Rem

70.1 (3.6)

0 (0)
-5.7% (-14.9, 3.5)
35 Dex

71.3 (3.6)

4 (11.4)
5.7% (-7.3, 18.8)
Nonrandomized Trial

Wang 2020ca

50 Plac

68.3 (2.1)

GI/Abd 3 (6.0)
— <55 bpm
60 Dex

68.4 (3.3)

4 (6.7)
0.7% (-8.5, 9.8)

Li 2020aa

46 None

67.3 (2.1)

Thoracic 2 (4.3)
— NR
41 Dex

67.4 (3.3)

1 (2.4)
-1.9% (-9.5, 5.6)
RD: risk difference; Dex: Dexmedetomidine; Dex/Preg: Dexmedetomidine/Pregabalin; Mid: Midazolam; Prop: Propofol; Ram: ramelteon; Plac: placebo; None: no active or placebo comparator; GI/Abd: gastrointestinal/abdominal; Ortho: orthopedic; Oralmax: oral or maxilofacial.
a Nonrandomized Trial

   Pooled

Figure 39. Risk ratio for bradycardia (dexmedetomidine versus placebo or no interventions; randomized clinical trials).

Harbord test for small study effects P = 0.39.
Similar arms combined in Li 2021b and Zhao 2020.

Figure 40. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention small study effects and bradycardia — funnel plot and limit meta-analysis.

Estimates (odds ratio and 95% CI) from random effects model — unadjusted 1.74 (1.32–2.31); adjusted for small study effects: 2.03 (1.21–3.40).

Figure 41. Risk difference for bradycardia (dexmedetomidine versus placebo or no interventions; randomized clinical trials).

Hypotension

Table 30. Hypotension in randomized and nonrandomized dexmedetomidine clinical trials.

Study  N Arm     Age Surgery N (%) 0 – 100% RD (95% CI) Criteria
Randomized Clinical Trial

Chen 2013

63 Plac

67.9 (6.6)

GI/Abd 0 (0)
— MAP <60
59 Dex

66.2 (7.5)

0 (0)
0.0% (-3.2, 3.2)

Chawdhary 2020

40 Prop

64.7 (5.9)

Various 4 (10.0)
— MAP ≤70
40 Dex

66.2 (6.6)

7 (17.5)
7.5% (-7.5, 22.5)

Wang 2020a

20 Mid

60.5 (8.2)

Oralmax 3 (15.0)
— ↓MAP >20%
20 Dex

60.0 (10.1)

4 (20.0)
5.0% (-18.5, 28.5)

Lee 2018b

31 Plac

67.2 (5.0)

Ortho 11 (35.5)
— SBP <90
33 Preg

68.4 (5.1)

14 (42.4)
6.9% (-16.9, 30.8)
29 Dex/Preg

65.4 (9.7)

21 (72.4)
36.9% (13.5, 60.3)
31 Dex

68.8 (5.9)

19 (61.3)
25.8% (1.8, 49.8)

Liu 2022b

60 Plac

72.1 (5.9)

Oralmax 1 (1.7)
— SBP <90
60 Dex

71.3 (6.7)

3 (5.0)
3.3% (-3.1, 9.7)

Wang 2022a

60 Plac

66.7 (4.1)

Urol 0 (0)
— SBP <90
60 Dex

65.6 (3.4)

0 (0)
0.0% (-3.2, 3.2)

Qu 2023

206 Plac

70.0 {65-75}

Cardiac 13 (6.3)
— SBP <90
188 Dex

67.5 {63-73}

20 (10.6)
4.3% (-1.2, 9.8)

Subramaniam 2019

61 Prop

70.0 {64-79}

Cardiac 21 (34.4)
— SBP <90 ≥5 min
59 Dex

66.5 {63-74}

21 (35.6)
1.2% (-15.9, 18.2)

Xin 2021

30 Plac

68.0 [66-71]

GI/Abd 6 (20.0)
— SBP <95
30 Dex

69.0 [67-70]

4 (13.3)
-6.7% (-25.5, 12.1)

Azeem 2018

30 Mid

66.7 (5.6)

Cardiac 0 (0)
— ↓SBP >20%
30 Dex

65.3 (4.8)

0 (0)
0.0% (-6.3, 6.3)

Lu 2021

331 Plac

70.4 (6.5)

GI/Abd 45 (13.6)
— ↓SBP >20% or <80
344 Dex

70.1 (5.8)

30 (8.7)
-4.9% (-9.6, -0.1)

Zhang 2020a

120 Plac

79.0 (6.8)

Ortho 8 (6.7)
— ↓SBP >20% or <90
120 Dex

78.1 (6.4)

10 (8.3)
1.7% (-5.0, 8.3)

Shi 2020

53 Plac

68.7 (3.4)

Thoracic 4 (7.5)
— ↓SBP >20% or <95
53 Dex

68.7 (4.6)

6 (11.3)
3.8% (-7.3, 14.9)

Guo 2015

73 Plac

71.3 (5.1)

Oralmax 2 (2.7)
— ↓SBP >30%
76 Dex

70.7 (5.2)

4 (5.3)
2.5% (-3.7, 8.8)

Hong 2021

354 Plac

71.0 (5.0)

Ortho 3 (0.8)
— ↓SBP >30% or <90
356 Dex

71.0 (5.0)

2 (0.6)
-0.3% (-1.5, 0.9)

Li 2017

143 Plac

67.5 (5.3)

Cardiac 10 (7.0)
— ↓SPB >30% ≥15 min
142 Dex

66.4 (5.4)

10 (7.0)
0.0% (-5.9, 6.0)

Zhao 2023

42 Plac

69.7 (7.2)

Ortho 6 (14.3)
— <20% from baseline
40 Dex

70.9 (7.2)

8 (20.0)
5.7% (-10.6, 22.0)

Deiner 2017

201 Plac

74.0 {71-78}

Various 95 (47.3)
— NS
189 Dex

74.0 {71-78}

102 (54.0)
6.7% (-3.2, 16.6)

Turan 2020

393 Plac

62.0 (12.0)

Cardiac 140 (35.6)
— NS
395 Dex

63.0 (11.0)

224 (56.7)
21.4% (14.6, 28.1)

Zhao 2020

101 None

69.2 (4.1)

Various 6 (5.9)
— NS
108 Dex

70.0 (4.5)

15 (13.9)
7.9% (-0.0, 15.9)
105 Dex

69.4 (3.9)

6 (5.7)
-0.2% (-6.6, 6.2)
102 Dex

69.3 (4.1)

7 (6.9)
0.9% (-5.8, 7.7)

Hu 2021

75 Plac

69.1 (5.1)

Thoracic 32 (42.7)
— NS
77 Dex

69.6 (4.5)

42 (54.5)
17.8% (2.7, 32.8)

Li 2021b

30 Plac

73.4 (5.1)

GI/Abd 8 (26.7)
— NS
30 Dex

74.7 (2.6)

11 (36.7)
10.0% (-13.4, 33.4)
30 Dex

71.2 (3.5)

10 (33.3)
6.7% (-16.5, 29.8)
30 Dex

69.8 (4.3)

21 (70.0)
43.3% (20.5, 66.1)

Xing 2021

55 Plac

69.2 (3.8)

Ortho 1 (1.8)
— NS
55 Dex

68.3 (3.9)

1 (1.8)
0.0% (-5.0, 5.0)

Lv 2022

157 Plac

68.4 (6.6)

Various 13 (8.3)
— NS
152 Dex

67.9 (5.9)

52 (34.2)
25.9% (17.2, 34.6)

Li 2023

49 None

68.5 (2.2)

Ortho 3 (6.1)
— NS
49 Dex

67.7 (2.8)

1 (2.0)
-4.1% (-11.9, 3.7)

Liao 2023

35 Plac

69.7 (2.5)

GI/Abd 2 (5.7)
— NS
35 Dex

71.3 (3.6)

3 (8.6)
2.9% (-9.2, 14.9)
Nonrandomized Trial

Wang 2020ca

50 Plac

68.3 (2.1)

GI/Abd 6 (12.0)
— SBP <90
60 Dex

68.4 (3.3)

5 (8.3)
-3.7% (-15.1, 7.7)

Li 2020aa

46 None

67.3 (2.1)

Thoracic 1 (2.2)
— NS
41 Dex

67.4 (3.3)

1 (2.4)
0.3% (-6.1, 6.6)
Retrospective Cohort

Xu 2022

30 None

67.9 (5.0)

Ortho 1 (3.3)
— NS
30 Dex

67.3 (5.5)

1 (3.3)
0.0% (-9.1, 9.1)
RD: risk difference; MAP: mean arterial blood pressure; Dex: Dexmedetomidine; Dex/Preg: Dexmedetomidine/Pregabalin; Mid: Midazolam; Prop: Propofol; Rem: remimazolam; Plac: placebo; None: no active or placebo comparator; GI/Abd: gastrointestinal/abdominal; Ortho: orthopedic; Urol: urologic; Oralmax: oral or maxilofacial; NS: not specified.
a Nonrandomized Trial

   Pooled

Figure 42. Risk ratio for hypotension (dexmedetomidine versus placebo or no interventions; randomized clinical trials).

Harbord test for small study effects P = 0.31.
Similar arms combined in Li 2021b and Zhao 2020.

Figure 43. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention small study effects and hypotension — funnel plot.

Estimates (odds ratio and 95% CI) from random effects models — unadjusted 1.57 (1.17–2.09); adjusted for small study effects: 1.79 (1.21–2.65).

Figure 44. Risk difference for hypotension (dexmedetomidine versus placebo or no interventions; randomized clinical trials).

Other

Table 31. Other complications reported in dexmedetomidine studies — cardiac, myocardial infarction, stroke, renal, and respiratory (randomized clinical trials unless noted).

Study  N Arm     Age Surgery N (%) 0 – 100% RD (95% CI)
Myocardial Infarction

Cheng 2016a

283 None

73.5 (6.2)

Cardiac 5 (1.8)
—
222 Dex

73.6 (6.1)

3 (1.4)
-0.4% (-2.6, 1.7)

Turan 2020

390 Plac

62.0 (12.0)

Cardiac 3 (0.8)
—
394 Dex

63.0 (11.0)

3 (0.8)
-0.0% (-1.2, 1.2)

Lu 2021

331 Plac

70.4 (6.5)

GI/Abd 0 (0)
—
344 Dex

70.1 (5.8)

0 (0)
0.0% (-0.6, 0.6)

Deiner 2017

157 Plac

74.0 {71-78}

Various 0 (0)
—
147 Dex

74.0 {71-78}

1 (0.7)
0.7% (-1.2, 2.5)
Cardiac Arrest

Cheng 2016a

283 None

73.5 (6.2)

Cardiac 3 (1.1)
—
222 Dex

73.6 (6.1)

2 (0.9)
-0.2% (-1.9, 1.6)
Other Arrhythmia

Turan 2020

390 Plac

62.0 (12.0)

Cardiac 134 (34.4)
—
394 Dex

63.0 (11.0)

121 (30.7)
-3.6% (-10.2, 2.9)

Gao 2021b

20 Plac

71.4 (4.5)

Cardiac 0 (0)
—
20 Dex

71.4 (4.5)

0 (0)
0.0% (-9.2, 9.2)

Xing 2021

55 Plac

69.2 (3.8)

Ortho 1 (1.8)
—
55 Dex

68.3 (3.9)

1 (1.8)
0.0% (-5.0, 5.0)
Stroke

Cheng 2016a

283 None

73.5 (6.2)

Cardiac 5 (1.8)
—
222 Dex

73.6 (6.1)

2 (0.9)
-0.9% (-2.8, 1.1)

Djainai 2016

92 Prop

72.4 (6.2)

Cardiac 3 (3.3)
—
91 Dex

72.7 (6.4)

4 (4.4)
1.1% (-4.4, 6.7)

Li 2017c

143 Plac

67.5 (5.3)

Cardiac 3 (2.1)
—
142 Dex

66.4 (5.4)

3 (2.1)
0.0% (-3.3, 3.3)

Soh 2020

53 Plac

65.0 [37-83]

Cardiac 2 (3.8)
—
51 Dex

65.0 [23-82]

3 (5.9)
2.1% (-6.1, 10.4)

Turan 2020

390 Plac

62.0 (12.0)

Cardiac 4 (1.0)
—
394 Dex

63.0 (11.0)

4 (1.0)
-0.0% (-1.4, 1.4)

Qu 2023

205 Plac

70.0 {65-75}

Cardiac 1 (0.5)
—
183 Dex

67.5 {63-73}

0 (0)
-0.5% (-1.9, 0.9)

Lu 2021

331 Plac

70.4 (6.5)

GI/Abd 0 (0)
—
344 Dex

70.1 (5.8)

0 (0)
0.0% (-0.6, 0.6)

Deiner 2017

157 Plac

74.0 {71-78}

Various 1 (0.6)
—
147 Dex

74.0 {71-78}

0 (0)
-0.6% (-2.4, 1.1)
Acute Kidney Injury

Cheng 2016a

283 None

73.5 (6.2)

Cardiac 13 (4.6)
—
222 Dex

73.6 (6.1)

13 (5.9)
1.3% (-2.7, 5.2)

Li 2017c

143 Plac

67.5 (5.3)

Cardiac 44 (30.8)
—
142 Dex

66.4 (5.4)

37 (26.1)
-4.7% (-15.2, 5.7)

Soh 2020

53 Plac

65.0 [37-83]

Cardiac 17 (32.1)
—
51 Dex

65.0 [23-82]

7 (13.7)
-18.3% (-34.1, -2.6)

Turan 2020

390 Plac

62.0 (12.0)

Cardiac 30 (7.7)
—
394 Dex

63.0 (11.0)

41 (10.4)
2.7% (-1.3, 6.7)

Gao 2021b

20 Plac

71.4 (4.5)

Cardiac 1 (5.0)
—
20 Dex

71.4 (4.5)

1 (5.0)
0.0% (-13.5, 13.5)

Momeni 2021

203 Plac

70.0 {59-81}

Cardiac 2 (1.0)
—
205 Dex

71.0 {61-81}

2 (1.0)
-0.0% (-1.9, 1.9)
Pulmonary

Li 2017c

143 Plac

67.5 (5.3)

Cardiac 27 (18.9)
—
142 Dex

66.4 (5.4)

15 (10.6)
-8.3% (-16.5, -0.2)

Gao 2021b

20 Plac

71.4 (4.5)

Cardiac 5 (25.0)
—
20 Dex

71.4 (4.5)

4 (20.0)
-5.0% (-30.8, 20.8)
Pneumonia

Soh 2020

53 Plac

65.0 [37-83]

Cardiac 6 (11.3)
—
51 Dex

65.0 [23-82]

7 (13.7)
2.4% (-10.3, 15.1)

Xie 2023

119 Plac

68.6 (5.5)

GI/Abd 6 (5.0)
—
117 Dex

67.9 (5.6)

4 (3.4)
-1.6% (-6.8, 3.5)

Deiner 2017

157 Plac

74.0 {71-78}

Various 1 (0.6)
—
147 Dex

74.0 {71-78}

3 (2.0)
1.4% (-1.2, 4.0)
Pulmonary Congestiond,e

Deiner 2017

157 Plac

74.0 {71-78}

Various 0 (0)
—
147 Dex

74.0 {71-78}

1 (0.7)
0.7% (-1.2, 2.5)
Pulmonary Embolism

Deiner 2017

157 Plac

74.0 {71-78}

Various 1 (0.6)
—
147 Dex

74.0 {71-78}

1 (0.7)
0.0% (-1.8, 1.9)
Respiratory Depression/Failure

Wu 2020

40 Plac

67.7 (8.8)

Cardiac 5 (12.5)
—
40 Dex

68.2 (8.6)

3 (7.5)
-5.0% (-18.1, 8.1)

Chen 2020

45 Plac

65.4 (11.7)

GI/Abd 3 (6.7)
—
43 Dex

64.9 (11.4)

0 (0)
-6.7% (-14.9, 1.6)

Guo 2015

73 Plac

71.3 (5.1)

Oralmax 0 (0)
—
76 Dex

70.7 (5.2)

0 (0)
0.0% (-2.6, 2.6)

Wang 2020a

20 Mid

60.5 (8.2)

Oralmax 7 (35.0)
—
20 Dex

60.0 (10.1)

1 (5.0)
-30.0% (-53.0, -7.0)

Deiner 2017

157 Plac

74.0 {71-78}

Various 1 (0.6)
—
147 Dex

74.0 {71-78}

2 (1.4)
0.7% (-1.5, 3.0)

Zhao 2020

101 None

69.2 (4.1)

Various 0 (0)
—
108 Dex

70.0 (4.5)

0 (0)
0.0% (-1.9, 1.9)
105 Dex

69.4 (3.9)

0 (0)
0.0% (-1.9, 1.9)
102 Dex

69.3 (4.1)

0 (0)
0.0% (-1.9, 1.9)
RD: risk difference.
a Retrospective Cohort
b Unspecified
c Pulmonary infection, pneumothorax, or pleural effusion needing intervention.
d Pulmonary congestion includes heart failure diagnosis.
e Includes unspecified, composite, respiratory depression, pleural effusion.

  Pooled

Figure 45. Risk ratios for other complications — cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, other arrhythmia (excludes bradycardia), stroke, pulmonary, and renal (dexmedetomidine versus placebo or no interventions).

Similar arms combined for Zhao 2020.

Figure 46. Risk differences for other complications — cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, other arrhythmia (excludes bradycardia), stroke, pulmonary, and acute kidney injury (dexmedetomidine versus placebo or no interventions).


Similar arms combined for Zhao 2020.

Ketamine

Table 32. Complications reported in ketamine randomized clinical trials — bradycardia, hypotension and renal.

Study  N Arm     Age Surgery N (%) 0 – 100% RD (95% CI) Note
Bradycardia

Ma 2023

31 Plac

70.5 (4.2)

GI/Abd 6 (19.4)
— <50 bpm
31 Ket

69.5 (4.3)

12 (38.7)
19.4% (-2.7, 41.4)
Hypotension

Ma 2023

31 Plac

70.5 (4.2)

GI/Abd 19 (61.3)
— ↓SBP >30% or <80
31 Ket

69.5 (4.3)

9 (29.0)
-32.3% (-55.7, -8.8)
Acute Kidney Injury

Remerand 2009

75 Plac

65.0 (14.0)

Ortho 10 (13.3)
—
79 Ket

64.0 (13.0)

9 (11.4)
-1.9% (-12.3, 8.5)

Ramelteon

Table 33. Complications reported in ramelteon studies — cardiac, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary, pneumonia, and renal (all before-after designs).

Study  N Arm     Age Surgery N (%) 0 – 100% RD (95% CI)
Arrhythmiaa

Miyata 2017b

58 None

76.5 [70-87]

Thoracic 5 (8.6)
—
24 Ram

79.0 [70-89]

0 (0)
-8.6% (-17.8, 0.6)
Pulmonary

Hokuto 2020b

186 None

69.0 [30-88]

GI/Abd 4 (2.2)
—
120 Ram

71.0 [34-85]

4 (3.3)
1.2% (-2.6, 5.0)
Pneumonia

Hokuto 2020b

186 None

69.0 [30-88]

GI/Abd 3 (1.6)
—
120 Ram

71.0 [34-85]

2 (1.7)
0.1% (-2.9, 3.0)

Miyata 2017b

58 None

76.5 [70-87]

Thoracic 4 (6.9)
—
24 Ram

79.0 [70-89]

1 (4.2)
-2.7% (-13.0, 7.6)
a Not otherwise specified.
b Before-After/Time Series

Figure 47. Risk difference in pneumonia (ramelteon versus no interventions; before-after studies).

Length of Stay

Dexmedetomidine

Table 34. Length of stay according to procedure classification and comparator in dexmedetomidine studies.

Study  N Comparator PSa     Ageb     LOSb 0 – 25 days Country
Cardiac - Randomized Clinical Trial

Djainai 2016

92 Prop NR

72.4 (6.2)

7.0 [4-74]

Canada
91 Dex NR

72.7 (6.4)

7.0 [4-35]

Ge 2016

24 Plac 123 

72.0 (4.0)

4.6 (1.1)

China
24 Dex 123 

70.0 (3.0)

4.6 (1.3)

Li 2017

143 Plac  234

67.5 (5.3)

9.0 {8-10}

China
142 Dex  234

66.4 (5.4)

9.0 {8-10}

Subramaniam 2019

61 Prop NR

70.0 {64-79}

8.0 {6-11}

USA
59 Dex NR

66.5 {63-74}

8.0 {6-10}

Soh 2020

54 Plac NR

65.0 [37-83]

15.0 {11-21}

South Korea
54 Dex NR

65.0 [23-82]

12.0 {10-17}

Turan 2020

396 Plac 1234

62.0 (12.0)

6.0 {5-7}

USA
398 Dex 1234

63.0 (11.0)

6.0 {5-8}

Gao 2021

20 Plac  23 

71.4 (4.5)

13.0 (2.0)

China
20 Dex  23 

71.4 (4.5)

10.0 (1.0)

Momeni 2021

203 Plac NR

70.0 {59-81}

7.0 {7-10}

Belgium
205 Dex NR

71.0 {61-81}

8.0 {7-10}

Chitnis 2022

33 Prop NR

78.8

12.2

Canada
34 Dex NR

78.7

10.2

Qu 2023

206 Plac NR

70.0 {65-75}

6.0 {5-7}

USA
188 Dex NR

67.5 {63-73}

6.0 {5-8}

Ortho - Randomized Clinical Trial

Mei 2018

148 Prop  23 

74.0 (6.0)

6.8 (2.0)

China
148 Dex  23 

76.0 (7.0)

6.3 (1.6)

Hong 2021

354 Plac 1234

71.0 (5.0)

5.0 {5-6}

China
356 Dex 1234

71.0 (5.0)

5.0 {5-6}

Yan 2021

50 Plac 12  

72.7 (4.3)

16.1 (0.7)

China
50 Dex 12  

73.2 (5.8)

13.2 (0.9)

Gao 2022

48 Plac 123 

67.2 (5.2)

5.0 (0.8)

China
47 Dex 123 

68.2 (6.0)

4.2 (0.7)

Deng 2023

52 Dex  23 

70.8 (4.4)

7.0 {6-10}

China
53 Dex  23 

71.8 (5.5)

7.0 {7-11}

GI/Abd - Randomized Clinical Trial

Lu 2021

331 Plac 123 

70.4 (6.5)

15.0 {11-18}

China
344 Dex 123 

70.1 (5.8)

13.0 {10-17}

Guo 2022

45 None  23 

68.5 (3.8)

25.5 (8.6)

China
45 Dex  23 

68.5 (3.8)

17.9 (8.1)

Xie 2023

119 Plac NR

68.6 (5.5)

11.6 (8.5)

China
117 Dex NR

67.9 (5.6)

11.7 (9.1)

Thoracic - Randomized Clinical Trial

Huyan 2019

173 Plac  23 

71.0 (6.0)

9.0 {7-11}

China
173 Dex  23 

70.0 (5.0)

8.0 {6-10}

ENT - Randomized Clinical Trial

Liu 2023c

149 Plac NR

70.1 (4.2)

13.0 {10-15}

China
150 Dex NR

70.4 (5.0)

13.0 {9-15}

Oralmax - Randomized Clinical Trial

Liu 2022b

60 Plac 12  

72.1 (5.9)

9.0 (2.8)

China
60 Dex 12  

71.3 (6.7)

9.0 (2.5)

Various - Randomized Clinical Trial

Deiner 2017

201 Plac 1234

74.0 {71-78}

4.0 {3-6}

USA
189 Dex 1234

74.0 {71-78}

4.0 {3-6}

Li 2020b

310 Plac 123 

69.0 (6.4)

10.3 (9.4)

China
309 Dex 123 

69.0 (6.6)

10.0 (7.6)

van Norden 2021

32 Plac 1234

70.5 (6.2)

21.0 (15.6)

Germany
28 Dex 1234

70.4 (7.1)

23.5 (20.3)

Lv 2022

157 Plac NR

68.4 (6.6)

17.2 (6.3)

China
152 Dex NR

67.9 (5.9)

15.6 (4.2)

Cardiac - Retrospective Cohort

Chuich 2019

209 Prop NR

62.0 (13.0)

8.3 (4.4)

USA
69 Dex NR

63.0 (13.0)

7.8 (3.1)

NR: not reported
a ASA Physical Status.
b Mean Med (SD)[Range]{IQR}.

Ketamine

Table 35. Length of stay according to procedure classification and comparator in ketamine studies.

Study  N Comparator PSa     Ageb     LOSb 0 – 25 days Country
Cardiac - Randomized Clinical Trial

Hudetz 2009a

26 Plac   34

67.0 (8.0)

7.0 (3.0)

USA
26 Ket   34

68.0 (7.0)

8.0 (4.0)

Ortho - Randomized Clinical Trial

Remerand 2009

75 Plac NR

65.0 (14.0)

8.3 (1.6)

France
79 Ket NR

64.0 (13.0)

8.8 (3.2)

Spine - Prospective Cohort

Barreto Chang 2022

38 None 123 

71.0 {68-78}

4.0 {3-6}

USA
60 Ket 123 

70.0 {67-75}

4.0 {2-6}

NR: not reported
a ASA Physical Status.
b Mean Med (SD)[Range]{IQR}.

Melatonin or ramelteon

Table 36. Length of stay according to procedure classification and comparator in melatonin or ramelteon studies.

Study  N Comparator PSa     Ageb     LOSb 0 – 25 days Country
Cardiac - Randomized Clinical Trial

Ford 2020

104 Plac NR

67.6 (8.0)

7.0 {6-8}

Australia
98 Mel NR

69.0 (8.3)

8.0 {6-10}

Shi 2021

149 Plac NR

71.6 (6.6)

13.4 (6.6)

China
148 Mel NR

71.5 (6.7)

15.9 (9.7)

Ortho - Randomized Clinical Trial

de Jonghe 2014

192 Plac NR

83.4 (7.5)

11.0 {8-17}

Netherlands
186 Mel NR

84.1 (8.0)

11.0 {6-14}

Fan 2017

70 Plac 123 

74.6 (5.4)

7.0 [5-21]

China
69 Mel 123 

74.5 (5.7)

7.0 [5-19]

Thoracic - Randomized Clinical Trial

Jaiswal 2019

58 Plac NR

56.1 (15.8)

12.0 {10-14}

USA
59 Ram NR

58.1 (14.1)

12.0 {10-16}

Thoracic - Before-After/Time Series

Miyata 2017

58 None NR

76.5 [70-87]

13.6 (7.8)

Japan
24 Ram NR

79.0 [70-89]

13.5 (9.6)

GI/Abd - Before-After/Time Series

Hokuto 2020

186 None 123 

69.0 [30-88]

9.0 [5-162]

Japan
120 Ram 123 

71.0 [34-85]

9.0 [4-80]

NR: not reported
a ASA Physical Status.
b Mean Med (SD)[Range]{IQR}.

Pooled

Dexmedetomidine

Figure 48. Mean difference in lengths of stay (dexmedetomidine versus placebo; randomized clinical trials).

MD: mean difference; Dex: Dexmedetomidine.
When the mean or standard deviation were not reported, they were imputed from from the median, interquartile range, and/or range. Hartung-Knapp adjustment not applied owing to interest in subgroups.

Figure 49. Dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention small study effects — funnel plot (length of stay).

Melatonin/Ramelteon

Figure 50. Mean difference in lengths of stay (melatonin or ramelteon versus placebo; randomized clinical trials).

MD: mean difference; Mel: melatonin; Ram: ramelteon.
When the mean or standard deviation were not reported, they were imputed from from the median, interquartile range, and/or range.

Mortality

Dexmedetomidine

Table 37. Reported in-hospital, 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality in dexmedetomidine randomized clinical trials by comparator and surgical category.

Study N Drug Surgery ASA Agea Mortality RD (95% CI)
PS N (%) 0 - 100%
Hospital

Djainai 2016

92 Prop Cardiac NR

72.4 (6.2)

0 (0)
—
91 Dex

72.7 (6.4)

1 (1.1)
1.1% (-1.9, 4.1)

Deiner 2017

201 Plac Various 1234

74.0 {71-78}

3 (1.5)
—
189 Dex

74.0 {71-78}

1 (0.5)
-1.0% (-2.9, 1.0)

Zhou 2019b

39 Plac Cardiac 123 

70.0 (4.9)

1 (2.6)
—
39 Ulin

70.6 (4.4)

0 (0)
-2.6% (-9.4, 4.3)
39 Dex/Ulin

69.6 (5.0)

0 (0)
-2.6% (-9.4, 4.3)
39 Dex

69.8 (5.1)

1 (2.6)
0.0% (-7.0, 7.0)

Turan 2020

387 Plac Cardiac 1234

62.0 (12.0)

1 (0.3)
—
391 Dex

63.0 (11.0)

1 (0.3)
-0.0% (-0.7, 0.7)

Soh 2020

53 Plac Cardiac NR

65.0 [37-83]

1 (1.9)
—
50 Dex

65.0 [23-82]

1 (2.0)
0.1% (-5.2, 5.4)

Momeni 2021

203 Plac Cardiac NR

70.0 {59-81}

10 (4.9)
—
205 Dex

71.0 {61-81}

1 (0.5)
-4.4% (-7.6, -1.3)

Chitnis 2022

33 Prop Cardiac NR

78.8

0 (0)
—
33 Dex

78.7

0 (0)
0.0% (-5.7, 5.7)

Qu 2023

206 Plac Cardiac NR

70.0 {65-75}

1 (0.5)
—
188 Dex

67.5 {63-73}

3 (1.6)
1.1% (-0.9, 3.1)
30-day

Li 2017

135 Plac Cardiac  234

67.5 (5.3)

4 (3.0)
—
139 Dex

66.4 (5.4)

2 (1.4)
-1.5% (-5.0, 2.0)

Li 2020b

310 Plac Various 123 

69.0 (6.4)

1 (0.3)
—
309 Dex

69.0 (6.6)

0 (0)
-0.3% (-1.2, 0.6)

Hong 2021

354 Plac Ortho 1234

71.0 (5.0)

0 (0)
—
356 Dex

71.0 (5.0)

0 (0)
0.0% (-0.6, 0.6)

Lu 2021

331 Plac GI/Abd 123 

70.4 (6.5)

0 (0)
—
344 Dex

70.1 (5.8)

1 (0.3)
0.3% (-0.5, 1.1)

Lv 2022

157 Plac Various NR

68.4 (6.6)

7 (4.5)
—
152 Dex

67.9 (5.9)

5 (3.3)
-1.2% (-5.5, 3.1)

Qu 2023

206 Plac Cardiac NR

70.0 {65-75}

1 (0.5)
0.0% (-1.3, 1.3)
188 Dex

67.5 {63-73}

3 (1.6)
1.1% (-0.9, 3.1)

Xie 2023

119 Plac GI/Abd NR

68.6 (5.5)

2 (1.7)
—
117 Dex

67.9 (5.6)

1 (0.9)
-0.8% (-3.7, 2.0)
90-day

van Norden 2021

32 Plac Various 1234

70.5 (6.2)

5 (15.6)
—
28 Dex

70.4 (7.1)

0 (0)
-15.6% (-29.2, -2.1)

Qu 2023

206 Plac Cardiac NR

70.0 {65-75}

1 (0.5)
0.0% (-1.3, 1.3)
188 Dex

67.5 {63-73}

4 (2.1)
1.6% (-0.6, 3.9)
ASA PS: American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status; RD: risk difference; GI: gastrointestinal; Abd: abdominal (includes hepatic); Ortho: orthopedic; Various: more that one procedure category; Dex: Dexmedetomidine; Ulin: Ulinastatin; MS: morphine sulfate; Plac; placebo.
a Mean Med (SD)[Range]{IQR}.

Ketamine

No studies


Melatonin/Ramelteon

Table 38. Reported in-hospital, 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality in melatonin and ramelteon studies by comparator and surgical category.

Study N Drug Surgery ASA Agea Mortality RD (95% CI)
PS N (%) 0 - 100%
Hospital

de Jonghe 2014b

192 Plac Ortho NR

83.4 (7.5)

4 (2.1)
—
186 Mel

84.1 (8.0)

4 (2.2)
0.1% (-2.8, 3.0)

Jaiswal 2019b

58 Plac Thoracic NR

56.1 (15.8)

4 (6.9)
—
59 Ram

58.1 (14.1)

3 (5.1)
-1.8% (-10.4, 6.8)
30-day

Shi 2021b

149 Plac Cardiac NR

71.6 (6.6)

21 (14.1)
—
148 Mel

71.5 (6.7)

18 (12.2)
-1.9% (-9.6, 5.7)

Hokuto 2020c

186 None GI/Abd 123 

69.0 [30-88]

0 (0)
—
120 Ram

71.0 [34-85]

0 (0)
0.0% (-1.4, 1.4)
90-day

de Jonghe 2014b

192 Plac Ortho

83.4 (7.5)

41 (21.4)
19.3% (13.1, 25.4)
186 Mel

84.1 (8.0)

39 (21.0)
18.9% (12.7, 25.1)
ASA PS: American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status; RD: risk difference; GI: gastrointestinal; Abd: abdominal (includes hepatic); Ortho: orthopedic; Various: more that one procedure category; Ram: ramelteon; Mel: melatonin; Plac; placebo.
a Mean Med (SD)[Range]{IQR}.
b Randomized clinical trial.
c Before-after design.

Pooled

Dexmedetomidine

Figure 51. Risk ratio for hospital and 30-day mortality – dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention.

Dex: dexmedetomidine; Plac: placebo.
*Trials conducted in China with RR 0.69 (95% CI, 0.41–1.15); others RR 0.59 (95% CI, 0.10–3.37).

Figure 52. Risk difference for hospital and 30-day mortality – dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention.

Dex: dexmedetomidine; Plac: placebo.
*Trials conducted in China.

Figure 53. Mortality for dexmedetomidine compared with placebo or no intervention small study effects — funnel plot.

Melatonin/Ramelteon

Figure 54. Risk difference for hospital and 30-day mortality – melatonin or ramelteon compared with placebo or no intervention.

Mel: melatonin; Ram: ramelteon; Plac: placebo.

Risk of Bias

Randomized

Figure 55. Summary risk of bias assessment for randomized clinical trials.

Figure 56. Risk of bias assessments for randomized clinical trials.

Nonrandomized

Figure 57. Summary risk of bias assessment for nonrandomized studies.

Figure 58. Risk of bias assessments for nonrandomized studies.

References

1.
Artemiou P, Bily B, Bilecova-Rabajdova M, Sabol F, Torok P, Kolarcik P, Kolesar A: Melatonin treatment in the prevention of postoperative delirium in cardiac surgery patients. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol 2015; 12:126–33
2.
Avidan MS, Maybrier HR, Abdallah AB, Jacobsohn E, Vlisides PE, Pryor KO, Veselis RA, Grocott HP, Emmert DA, Rogers EM, Downey RJ, Yulico H, Noh GJ, Lee YH, Waszynski CM, Arya VK, Pagel PS, Hudetz JA, Muench MR, Fritz BA, Waberski W, Inouye SK, Mashour GA: Intraoperative ketamine for prevention of postoperative delirium or pain after major surgery in older adults: An international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2017; 390:267–75
3.
Azeem TMA, Yosif NE, Alansary AM, Esmat IM, Mohamed AK: Dexmedetomidine vs morphine and midazolam in the prevention and treatment of delirium after adult cardiac surgery; a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia 2018; 12:190–7
4.
Barreto Chang OL, Kreuzer M, Morgen DF, Possin KL, Garcia PS: Ketamine associated intraoperative electroencephalographic signatures of elderly patients with and without preoperative cognitive impairment. Anesth Analg 2022 doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000005875
5.
Bily B, Sabol F, Török P, Artemiou P, Bilecova-Rabajdova M, Kolarcik P: Influence of prophylactic melatonin administration on the incidence of early postoperative delirium in cardiac surgery patients. Anesteziologie a Intenzivni Medicina 2015; 26:319–27
6.
Bornemann-Cimenti H, Wejbora M, Michaeli K, Edler A, Sandner-Kiesling A: The effects of minimal-dose versus low-dose s-ketamine on opioid consumption, hyperalgesia, and postoperative delirium: A triple-blinded, randomized, active- and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Minerva Anestesiol 2016; 82:1069–76
7.
Chawdhary AA, Kulkarni A, Nozari A: Substitution of propofol for dexmedetomidine in the anaesthetic regimen does not ameliorate the post-operative cognitive decline in elderly patients. Indian J Anaesth 2020; 64:880–6
8.
Chen H, Li F: Effect of dexmedetomidine with different anesthetic dosage on neurocognitive function in elderly patients after operation based on neural network model. World Neurosurg 2020; 138:688–95
9.
Chen J, Yan J, Han X: Dexmedetomidine may benefit cognitive function after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients. Exp Ther Med 2013; 5:489–94
10.
Cheng H, Li Z, Young N, Boyd D, Atkins Z, Ji F, Liu H: The effect of dexmedetomidine on outcomes of cardiac surgery in elderly patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2016; 30:1502–8
11.
Chitnis S, Mullane D, Brohan J, Noronha A, Paje H, Grey R, Bhalla RK, Sidhu J, Klein R: Dexmedetomidine use in intensive care unit sedation and postoperative recovery in elderly patients post-cardiac surgery (DIRECT). J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2022; 36:880–92
12.
Chuich T, Cropsey CL, Shi Y, Johnson D, Shotwell MS, Henson CP: Perioperative sedation in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgery patients with dexmedetomidine-based versus propofol-based regimens. Ann Pharmacother 2019; 53:5–12
13.
Jonghe A e, Munster BC van, Goslings JC, Kloen P, Rees C van, Wolvius R, Velde R van, Levi M, Haan RJ e, Rooij SE e, Amsterdam Delirium Study G: Effect of melatonin on incidence of delirium among patients with hip fracture: A multicentre, double-blind randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 2014; 186:E547–56
14.
Deiner S, Luo X, Lin HM, Sessler DI, Saager L, Sieber FE, Lee HB, Sano M, Jankowski C, Bergese SD, Candiotti K, Flaherty JH, Arora H, Shander A, Rock P: Intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine for prevention of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing major elective noncardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2017; 152:e171505
15.
Deng CM, Meng ZT, Yang J, Zhang CJ, Lu M, Wang YX, Mu DL: Effect of intraoperative remimazolam on postoperative sleep quality in elderly patients after total joint arthroplasty: A randomized control trial. Journal of Anesthesia 2023; 37:511–21
16.
Dianatkhah M, Ghaeli P, Hajhossein Talasaz A, Karimi A, Salehiomran A, Bina P, Jalali A, Ghaffary S, Shahmansouri N, Vejdani S: Evaluating the potential effect of melatonin on the post-cardiac surgery sleep disorder. J Tehran Heart Cent 2015; 10:122–8
17.
Ding L, Zhang H, Mi W, Wang T, He Y, Zhang X, Ma X, Li H: Effects of dexmedetomidine on anesthesia recovery period and postoperative cognitive function of patients after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8:11388–95
18.
Djaiani G, Silverton N, Fedorko L, Carroll J, Styra R, Rao V, Katznelson R: Dexmedetomidine versus propofol sedation reduces delirium after cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2016; 124:362–8
19.
Du X, Song F, Zhang X, Ma S: Protective efficacy of combined use of parecoxib and dexmedetomidine on postoperative hyperalgesia and early cognitive dysfunction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for elderly patients. Acta Cir Bras 2019; 34:e201900905
20.
El-Naggar DI, Sharaf SI, Nasr El-Din DA, Mahran MG, Nawar DFA: A study of the prophylactic and curative effect of melatonin on postoperative delirium after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in elderly patients. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine 2018; 72:4919–26
21.
Esmaeili A, Fanoodi A, Ebrahimi A, Zangoue M, Khojasteh-Kaffash S: The efficacy of melatonin and clonidine in preventing emergence delirium in the elderly undergoing orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, and general surgery: A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci 2022; 26:e128831
22.
Fan Y, Yuan L, Ji M, Yang J, Gao D: The effect of melatonin on early postoperative cognitive decline in elderly patients undergoing hip arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 2017; 39:77–81
23.
Fazel MR, Mofidian S, Mahdian M, Akbari H, Razavizadeh MR: The effect of melatonin on prevention of postoperative delirium after lower limb fracture surgery in elderly patients: A randomized double blind clinical trial. International journal of burns and trauma 2022; 12 4:161–7
24.
Ford AH, Flicker L, Kelly R, Patel H, Passage J, Wibrow B, Anstey M, Edwards M, Almeida OP: The healthy heart-mind trial: Randomized controlled trial of melatonin for prevention of delirium. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 68:112–9
25.
Fuchita M, Khan SH, Perkins AJ, Gao S, Wang S, Kesler KA, Khan BA: Perioperative risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2022; 108:190–5
26.
Gao C, Huang T, Wu K, Zhang W, Wang S, Chai X, Xie Y, Tang C: Multimodal analgesia for accelerated rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial on the effect of the co-application of local infiltration analgesia and femoral nerve block combined with dexmedetomidine. Brain Sciences 2022; 12
27.
Gao Y, Yu H, Wang W, Wang Y, Teng J, Li F: Effect of dexmedetomidine on the neuroglobin expression in elderly patients with minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart Surg Forum 2021; 24:E776–e780
28.
Gao Y, Zhu X, Huang L, Teng J, Li F: Effects of dexmedetomidine on cerebral oxygen saturation and postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2020; 74:383–9
29.
Ge YL, Li X, Gao J, Zhang X, Fang X, Zhou L, Ji W, Lin S: Beneficial effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine on cognitive function and cerebral injury following a carotid endarterectomy. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 2016; 11:1128–34
30.
Guo L, Liu Y, Wang M: Effect of perioperative dexmedetomidine anesthesia on prognosis of elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumor surgery. Comput Math Methods Med 2022; 2022:7889372
31.
Guo Y, Sun L, Zhang J, Li Q, Jiang H, Jiang W: Preventive effects of low-dose dexmedetomidine on postoperative cognitive function and recovery quality in elderly oral cancer patients. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8:16183–90
32.
Gupta PK, Verma R, Kohli M, Shukla N, Kannaujia S: The effect of ramelteon on postoperative delirium in elderly patients: A randomised double-blind study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2019; 13:UC15–9
33.
Han C, Ji H, Guo Y, Fei Y, Wang C, Yuan Y, Ruan Z, Ma T: Effect of subanesthetic dose of esketamine on perioperative neurocognitive disorders in elderly undergoing gastrointestinal surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Drug Des Devel Ther 2023; 17:863–73
34.
He F, Shen L, Zhong J: A study of dexmedetomidine in the prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients after vertebral osteotomy. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 2018; 11:4984–90
35.
Hokuto D, Nomi T, Yoshikawa T, Matsuo Y, Kamitani N, Sho M: Preventative effects of ramelteon against postoperative delirium after elective liver resection. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0241673
36.
Hollinger A, Rüst CA, Riegger H, Gysi B, Tran F, Brügger J, Huber J, Toft K, Surbeck M, Schmid HR, Rentsch K, Steiner L, Siegemund M: Ketamine vs. Haloperidol for prevention of cognitive dysfunction and postoperative delirium: A phase IV multicentre randomised placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial. J Clin Anesth 2021; 68:110099
37.
Hong H, Zhang DZ, Li M, Wang G, Zhu SN, Zhang Y, Wang DX, Sessler DI: Impact of dexmedetomidine supplemented analgesia on delirium in patients recovering from orthopedic surgery: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2021; 21:223
38.
Hu G, Long A, Wang J, Wang X: Effects of oral atorvastatin on inflammatory markers and postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture surgery. Farmacia 2022; 70:944–53
39.
Hu J, Zhu M, Gao Z, Zhao S, Feng X, Chen J, Zhang Y, Maze M: Dexmedetomidine for prevention of postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing oesophagectomy with total intravenous anaesthesia: A double-blind, randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2021; 38:S9–s17
40.
Hudetz JA, Iqbal Z, Gandhi SD, Patterson KM, Byrne AJ, Hudetz AG, Pagel PS, Warltier DC: Ketamine attenuates post-operative cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53:864–72
41.
Hudetz JA, Patterson KM, Iqbal Z, Gandhi SD, Byrne AJ, Hudetz AG, Warltier DC, Pagel PS: Ketamine attenuates delirium after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009; 23:651–7
42.
Huyan T, Hu X, Peng H, Zhu Z, Li Q, Zhang W: Perioperative dexmedetomidine reduces delirium in elderly patients after lung cancer surgery. Psychiatr Danub 2019; 31:95–101
43.
Ishibashi-Kanno N, Takaoka S, Nagai H, Okubo-Sato M, Fukuzawa S, Uchida F, Yamagata K, Yanagawa T, Bukawa H: Postoperative delirium after reconstructive surgery for oral tumor: A retrospective clinical study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2020; 49:1143–8
44.
Jaiswal SJ, Vyas AD, Heisel AJ, Ackula H, Aggarwal A, Kim NH, Kerr KM, Madani M, Pretorius V, Auger WR, Fernandes TM, Malhotra A, Owens RL: Ramelteon for prevention of postoperative delirium: A randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing elective pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Crit Care Med 2019; 47:1751–8
45.
Javaherforoosh Zadeh F, Janatmakan F, Shafaeebejestan E, Jorairahmadi S: Effect of melatonin on delirium after on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci 2022; 46:120–7
46.
Juliebø V, Bjøro K, Krogseth M, Skovlund E, Ranhoff AH, Wyller TB: Risk factors for preoperative and postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57:1354–61
47.
Ke Y, Chew S, Seet E, Wong WY, Lim V, Chua N, Zhang J, Lim B, Chua V, Loh NHW, Ti LK: Incidence and risk factors of delirium in post-anaesthesia care unit. Ann Acad Med Singap 2022; 51:87–95
48.
Kinouchi M, Mihara T, Taguri M, Ogura M: The efficacy of ramelteon to prevent postoperative delirium after general anesthesia in the elderly: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2023 doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2023.07.011
49.
Kowalczyk M, Panasiuk-Kowalczyk A, Stadnik A, Guz M, Cybulski M, Jeleniewicz W, Stepulak A, Kwiatosz-Muc M: Dexmedetomidine increases MMP-12 and MBP concentrations after coronary artery bypass graft surgery with extracorporeal circulation anaesthesia without impacting cognitive function: A randomised control trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022; 19
50.
Lai Y, Chen Q, Xiang C, Li G, Wei K: Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine on stress response and postoperative delirium of older patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Interv Aging 2023; 18:1275–83
51.
Lee C, Lee CH, Lee G, Lee M, Hwang J: The effect of the timing and dose of dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium in elderly patients after laparoscopic major non-cardiac surgery: A double blind randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth 2018; 47:27–32
52.
Lee C, Lee J, Lee G, Lee H, Koh E, Hwang J: Pregabalin and dexmedetomidine combined for pain after total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty performed under spinal anesthesia. Orthopedics 2018; 41:365–70
53.
Lee KH, Kim JY, Kim JW, Park JS, Lee KW, Jeon SY: Influence of ketamine on early postoperative cognitive function after orthopedic surgery in elderly patients. Anesth Pain Med 2015; 5:e28844
54.
Li CJ, Wang BJ, Mu DL, Hu J, Guo C, Li XY, Ma D, Wang DX: Randomized clinical trial of intraoperative dexmedetomidine to prevent delirium in the elderly undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. British Journal of Surgery 2020; 107:e123–32
55.
Li JQ, Yuan H, Wang XQ, Yang M: Dexmedetomidine-induced anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. World Journal of Clinical Cases 2023; 11:3756–64
56.
Li WX, Luo RY, Chen C, Li X, Ao JS, Liu Y, Yin YQ: Effects of propofol, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients: A randomized controlled preliminary trial. Chin Med J (Engl) 2019; 132:437–45
57.
Li X, Yang J, Nie XL, Zhang Y, Li XY, Li LH, Wang DX, Ma D: Impact of dexmedetomidine on the incidence of delirium in elderly patients after cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0170757
58.
Li Y, He R, Chen S, Qu Y: Effect of dexmedetomidine on early postoperative cognitive dysfunction and peri-operative inflammation in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Exp Ther Med 2015; 10:1635–42
59.
Li Y, Wang C, Bi M, Gao J, Zhang X, Tian H: Effect of dexmedetomidine on brain function and hemodynamics in patients undergoing lung cancer resection. Oncology Letters 2020; 20:1077–82
60.
Li Z, Yao S, Cheng M, Chen J: Evaluation of the effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative cognitive dysfunction through aβand cytokines analysis. Iran J Pharm Res 2021; 20:515–22
61.
Liao YQ, Min J, Wu ZX, Hu Z: Comparison of the effects of remimazolam and dexmedetomidine on early postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients with gastric cancer. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 2023; 15
62.
Liu J, Li J, Gao D, Wang J, Liu M, Yu D: High ASA physical status and low serum uric acid to creatinine ratio are independent risk factors for postoperative delirium among older adults undergoing urinary calculi surgery. Clin Interv Aging 2023; 18:81–92
63.
Liu T, Liu FC, Xia Y, Luo TJ, Wang F, Chen B, Wang C, Gao GK, Zhai WT, Liu W: Effect of dexmedetomidine on the montreal cognitive assessment in older patients undergoing pulmonary surgery. J Int Med Res 2022; 50:3000605221123680
64.
Liu T, Tuo J, Wei Q, Sun X, Zhao H, Zhao X, Qu M: Effect of perioperative dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15:6105–13
65.
Liu W, Wang Y, Chen K, Ye M, Lu W, Chen K, Shen X: Effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine use on postoperative delirium in the elderly after laryngectomy: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2023; 17:2933–41
66.
Liu Y, Ma L, Gao M, Guo W, Ma Y: Dexmedetomidine reduces postoperative delirium after joint replacement in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment. Aging Clin Exp Res 2016; 28:729–36
67.
Lu J, Chen G, Zhou H, Zhou Q, Zhu Z, Wu C: Effect of parecoxib sodium pretreatment combined with dexmedetomidine on early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients after shoulder arthroscopy: A randomized double blinded controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 2017; 41:30–4
68.
Lu Y, Fang PP, Yu YQ, Cheng XQ, Feng XM, Wong GTC, Maze M, Liu XS, Collaborators PS: Effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on recovery of gastrointestinal function after abdominal surgery in older adults: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 4:e2128886
69.
Lv Y, Gu L: Dexmedetomidine potential in attenuating postoperative delirium in elderly patients after total hip joint replacement. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2022; 68:1166–71
70.
Ma J, Wang F, Wang J, Wang P, Dou X, Yao S, Lin Y: The effect of low-dose esketamine on postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia for gastrointestinal tumors: A randomized controlled trial. Drug Des Devel Ther 2023; 17:1945–57
71.
Mansouri N, Nasrollahi K, Shetabi H: Prevention of cognitive dysfunction after cataract surgery with intravenous administration of midazolam and dexmedetomidine in elderly patients undergoing cataract surgery. Adv Biomed Res 2019; 8:6
72.
Mei B, Meng G, Xu G, Cheng X, Chen S, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Liu X, Gu E: Intraoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine is superior to propofol for elderly patients undergoing hip arthroplasty: A prospective randomized controlled study. Clin J Pain 2018; 34:811–7
73.
Mei B, Xu G, Han W, Lu X, Liu R, Cheng X, Chen S, Gu E, Liu X, Zhang Y: The benefit of dexmedetomidine on postoperative cognitive function is unrelated to the modulation on peripheral inflammation: A single-center, prospective, randomized study. Clin J Pain 2020; 36:88–95
74.
Memtsoudis S, Cozowicz C, Zubizarreta N, Weinstein SM, Liu J, Kim DH, Poultsides L, Berger MM, Mazumdar M, Poeran J: Risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients undergoing lower extremity joint arthroplasty: A retrospective population-based cohort study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2019 doi:10.1136/rapm-2019-100700
75.
Miyata R, Omasa M, Fujimoto R, Ishikawa H, Aoki M: Efficacy of ramelteon for delirium after lung cancer surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2017; 24:8–12
76.
Mohamed SA, Rady A, Youssry M, Abdelaziz Mohamed MR, Gamal M: Performance of melatonin as prophylaxis in geriatric patients with multifactorial risk for postoperative delirium development: A randomized comparative study. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2022; 50:178–86
77.
Mohamed S, Shaaban AR: The effect of dexmedetomidine on the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients after prolonged abdominal surgery. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia 2014; 30:331–8
78.
Momeni M, Khalifa C, Lemaire G, Watremez C, Tircoveanu R, Van Dyck M, Kahn D, Rosal Martins M, Mastrobuoni S, De Kerchove L, Zango SH, Jacquet LM: Propofol plus low-dose dexmedetomidine infusion and postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2021; 126:665–73
79.
Oh ES, Leoutsakos JM, Rosenberg PB, Pletnikova AM, Khanuja HS, Sterling RS, Oni JK, Sieber FE, Fedarko NS, Akhlaghi N, Neufeld KJ: Effects of ramelteon on the prevention of postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: The RECOVER randomized controlled trial. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021; 29:90–100
80.
Oriby ME, Elrashidy AA, Elsharkawy A, Ahmed SA: Effects of ketamine or dexmedetomidine on postoperative cognitive dysfunction after cataract surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 2023; 67:186–93
81.
Park JW, Kim EK, Lee HT, Park S, Do SH: The effects of propofol or dexmedetomidine sedation on postoperative recovery in elderly patients receiving lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia: A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10
82.
Poeran J, Cozowicz C, Zubizarreta N, Weinstein SM, Deiner SG, Leipzig RM, Friedman JI, Liu J, Mazumdar M, Memtsoudis SG: Modifiable factors associated with postoperative delirium after hip fracture repair. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2020; 37:649–58
83.
Qu JZ, Mueller A, McKay TB, Westover MB, Shelton KT, Shaefi S, D’Alessandro DA, Berra L, Brown EN, Houle TT, Akeju O: Nighttime dexmedetomidine for delirium prevention in non-mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery (MINDDS): A single-centre, parallel-arm, randomised, placebo-controlled superiority trial. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 56:101796
84.
Rascón-Martı́nez DM, Fresán-Orellana A, Ocharán-Hernández ME, Genis-Zarate JH, Castellanos-Olivares A: The effects of ketamine on cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery: A pilot study. Anesth Analg 2016; 122:969–75
85.
Remérand F, Le Tendre C, Baud A, Couvret C, Pourrat X, Favard L, Laffon M, Fusciardi J: The early and delayed analgesic effects of ketamine after total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Anesth Analg 2009; 109:1963–71
86.
Shi H, Du X, Wu F, Hu Y, Xv Z, Mi W: Dexmedetomidine improves early postoperative neurocognitive disorder in elderly male patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy. Exp Ther Med 2020; 20:3868–77
87.
Shi Y: Effects of melatonin on postoperative delirium after PCI in elderly patients: A randomized, single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Heart Surg Forum 2022; 24:E893–7
88.
Shin HJ, Woo Nam S, Kim H, Yim S, Han SH, Hwang JW, Do SH, Na HS: Postoperative delirium after dexmedetomidine versus propofol sedation in healthy older adults undergoing orthopedic lower limb surgery with spinal anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2023; 138:164–71
89.
Siripoonyothai S, Sindhvananda W: Comparison of postoperative delirium within 24 hours between ketamine and propofol infusion during cardiopulmonary bypass machine: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Card Anaesth 2021; 24:294–301
90.
Soh S, Shim JK, Song JW, Bae JC, Kwak YL: Effect of dexmedetomidine on acute kidney injury after aortic surgery: A single-centre, placebo-controlled, randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2020; 124:386–94
91.
Subramaniam B, Shankar P, Shaefi S, Mueller A, O’Gara B, Banner-Goodspeed V, Gallagher J, Gasangwa D, Patxot M, Packiasabapathy S, Mathur P, Eikermann M, Talmor D, Marcantonio ER: Effect of intravenous acetaminophen vs placebo combined with propofol or dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium among older patients following cardiac surgery: The DEXACET randomized clinical trial. Jama 2019; 321:686–96
92.
Sultan SS: Assessment of role of perioperative melatonin in prevention and treatment of postoperative delirium after hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia in the elderly. Saudi J Anaesth 2010; 4:169–73
93.
Sun Y, Peng HP, Wu TT: Postoperative c-reactive protein predicts postoperative delirium in colorectal cancer following surgery. Clinical Interventions in Aging 2023; 18:559–70
94.
Tang Y, Liu J, Huang X, Ding H, Tan S, Zhu Y: Effect of dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous inhalation combined anesthesia on cerebral oxygen metabolism and serum Th1/Th2 level in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Front Surg 2022; 8:832646
95.
Tanifuji T, Otsuka I, Okazaki S, Horai T, So R, Shiroiwa K, Mouri K, Tanaka M, Ohmoto N, Sora I, Hirai M, Fukumoto T, Ku Y, Hishimoto A: Preventive effects of preoperative ramelteon on postoperative delirium in asian elderly population: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, and a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Psychiatr 2022; 78:103282
96.
Tu W, Yuan H, Zhang S, Lu F, Yin L, Chen C, Li J: Influence of anesthetic induction of propofol combined with esketamine on perioperative stress and inflammatory responses and postoperative cognition of elderly surgical patients. American Journal of Translational Research 2021; 13:1701–9
97.
Turan A, Duncan A, Leung S, Karimi N, Fang J, Mao G, Hargrave J, Gillinov M, Trombetta C, Ayad S, Hassan M, Feider A, Howard-Quijano K, Ruetzler K, Sessler DI, Group DS: Dexmedetomidine for reduction of atrial fibrillation and delirium after cardiac surgery (DECADE): A randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 396:177–85
98.
Norden J van, Spies CD, Borchers F, Mertens M, Kurth J, Heidgen J, Pohrt A, Mueller A: The effect of peri-operative dexmedetomidine on the incidence of postoperative delirium in cardiac and non-cardiac surgical patients: A randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2021; 76:1342–51
99.
Vovk Racman P, Kšela J, Racman M, Žerjav U, Šoštarič M: Comparison of procedural sedation with propofol and dexmedetomidine during transcatheter aortic valve replacement using the transfemoral approach. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2023; 37:1894–900
100.
Wang F, Xie D, Xu H, Ye Q, Wu L, Gao XP: The effects of remifentanil-propofol combined with dexmedetomidine on cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients after ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:192
101.
Wang L, Zhang T, Huang L, Peng W: Comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in patients with intubation after oral and maxillofacial surgery. Biomed Res Int 2020; 2020:7082597
102.
Wang W, Feng N, Zhao W, Luo F, Zhu X, Zhao W, Liu Z, Xu L: Dexmedetomidine reduces brain neuronal injuries but not clinical neurocognitive function in the elderly, compared to midazolam. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 2019; 12:4210–7
103.
Wang W, Ma Y, Liu Y, Wang P, Liu Y: Effects of dexmedetomidine anesthesia on early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients. ACS Chem Neurosci 2022; 13:2309–14
104.
Wang Z, Shen Z, Wang H, Zhang L, Dong R: Effect of dexmedetomidine on the cognitive function of patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery by regulating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Oncology Letters 2020; 19:1151–6
105.
Weinstein SM, Poultsides L, Baaklini LR, Mörwald EE, Cozowicz C, Saleh JN, Arrington MB, Poeran J, Zubizarreta N, Memtsoudis SG: Postoperative delirium in total knee and hip arthroplasty patients: A study of perioperative modifiable risk factors. Br J Anaesth 2018; 120:999–1008
106.
Wu LP, Kang WQ: Effect of dexmedetomidine for sedation and cognitive function in patients with preoperative anxiety undergoing carotid artery stenting. J Int Med Res 2020; 48:300060520938959
107.
Xie K, Chen J, Tian L, Gu F, Pan Y, Huang Z, Fang J, Yu W, Zhou H: Postoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing surgery. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2023; 35:2137–44
108.
Xie S, Xie M: Effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Pak J Pharm Sci 2018; 31:2277–81
109.
Xin X, Chen J, Hua W, Wang H: Intraoperative dexmedetomidine for prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021; 36:143–51
110.
Xing C, Yan C: Effects of dexmedetomidine on the incidence of postoperative delirium and plasma s-100βprotein levels following hip surgery in the elderly population. International Journal of Gerontology 2021; 15:207–11
111.
Xu HY, Fu GH, Wu GS: Effect of dexmedetomidine-induced anesthesia on the postoperative cognitive function of elder patients after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. Saudi J Biol Sci 2017; 24:1771–5
112.
Xu T, Chen X, Li X, Wang M, Wang M: Effect of dexmedetomidine-assisted ultrasound-guided lower extremity nerve block on postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing hip surgery. Am J Transl Res 2022; 14:7977–84
113.
Yan C, Ti-jun D: Effects of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. International Surgery 2021; 105:328–35
114.
Yin L, Yuan H, Chen X, Liao M, Lu F: Mechanism of action of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamics, analgesic and sedative effects and postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 2020; 13:6703–9
115.
Yoo SH, Jue MJ, Kim YH, Cho S, Kim WJ, Kim KM, Han JI, Lee H: The effect of dexmedetomidine on the mini-cog score and high-mobility group box 1 levels in elderly patients with postoperative neurocognitive disorders undergoing orthopedic surgery. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2023; 12
116.
Yu DN, Zhu Y, Ma J, Sun Q: Comparison of post-anesthesia delirium in elderly patients treated with dexmedetomidine and midazolam maleate after thoracic surgery. Biomedical Research (India) 2017; 28:6852–5
117.
Zhang H, Wu Z, Zhao X, Qiao Y: Role of dexmedetomidine in reducing the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction caused by sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia in elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma. J Cancer Res Ther 2018; 14:1497–502
118.
Zhang J, Liu G, Zhang F, Fang H, Zhang D, Liu S, Chen B, Xiao H: Analysis of postoperative cognitive dysfunction and influencing factors of dexmedetomidine anesthesia in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett 2019; 18:3058–64
119.
Zhang L, Zhu B, Zhang L, Tian Z, Zhang X, Lin F: Effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on stress responses and postoperative cognitive function in spine surgery for elderly patients. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 2020; 13:6868–76
120.
Zhang W, Wang T, Wang G, Yang M, Zhou Y, Yuan Y: Effects of dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium and expression of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-αin elderly patients after hip fracture operation. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:678
121.
Zhang Z, Li W, Jia H: Postoperative effects of dexmedetomidine on serum inflammatory factors and cognitive malfunctioning in patients with general anesthesia. J Healthc Eng 2021; 2021:7161901
122.
Zhao W, Hu Y, Chen H, Wang X, Wang L, Wang Y, Wu X, Han F: The effect and optimal dosage of dexmedetomidine plus sufentanil for postoperative analgesia in elderly patients with postoperative delirium and early postoperative cognitive dysfunction: A single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:549516
123.
Zhao W, Li J, Wang J, Liu M, Yu D: Effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative cognitive dysfunction and the t helper 17/regulatory t cell balance in geriatric patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: A randomized controlled study. American Journal of Translational Research 2023; 15:2634–44
124.
Zhou M, Lyu Y, Zhu Y, Jiang T, Wu C, Yang J, Wang L: Effect of ulinastatin combined with dexmedetomidine on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in patients who underwent cardiac surgery. Frontiers in Neurology 2019; 10
125.
Zhu Y, Le G: The effect of dexmedetomidine combined with epidural anesthesia on post-operative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients after orthopedic surgery. Am J Transl Res 2022; 13:12058–64